Die Abduktion in der qualitativen Sozialforschung
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Abductive inference often starts from a surprising, anomalous event that cannot be explained on the basis of previous knowledge.
“Often such an”
From "Emergence" vs. "Forcing" of Empirical Data? A Crucial Problem of "Grounded Theory" Reconsidered (2005) · cites this paper as REICHERTZ 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
"Emergence" vs. "Forcing" of Empirical Data? A Crucial Problem of "Grounded Theory" Reconsidered
Kelle, U. (2005) · Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research · doi:10.17169/fqs-6.2.467 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reichertz, J.
- Corresponding author
- Reichertz, Jo
- ORCID
- Reichertz, Jo
- Venue
- VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks
- Publisher
- VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
- Published
- 2003
- OpenAlex
- W4234128126
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- book
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › German Social Sciences and History
- Keywords
- abduction, qualitative social research, research methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
