Cited by 69Animal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Applications of Personality to the Management and Conservation of Nonhuman Animals

Powell, David M., Gartner, Marieke Cassia·2011·Primatology Monographs

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-4-431-53892-9_8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powell, D. M., & Gartner, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Gartner, Marieke Cassia
Venue
Primatology Monographs
Published
2011
Pages
185-199
ISSN
  • 2190-5967 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-5975
OpenAlex
W206410488
Cited by
69
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7
FWCI
13.08
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Primatology monographs (publishedVersion)
Funders
Smithsonian Institution
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
animal personality, behavioral syndromes, animal temperament, animal conservation, wildlife management, animal decision-making, population persistence, anthropogenic environmental change, reintroduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review