Cited by 86Indigenous Peoples' Rights and LawInternational Maritime Law IssuesIntellectual Property Law

Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing

·2009·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of the anti-cancer drug taxol from bark extracts lead to illegal overharvesting in which trees were killed by stripping them entirely, endangering the yew.

    “The development of the anti-cancer drug taxol from bark extracts lead to illegal overharvesting in which trees were killed by stripping them entirely, endangering the yew (Laird and Wynberg 2008;Wynberg et al. 2009).”

Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2009
OpenAlex
W2499975446
Cited by
86
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.10
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Maritime Law Issues
  • Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Law
Keywords
Hoodia, bioprospecting, indigenous peoples, informed consent, benefit sharing, traditional knowledge, indigenous rights, intellectual property

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review