CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Work-Family Balance ChallengesFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsWorkplace Health and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Family-to-Work Conflict

Weer, Christy, Greenhaus, Jeffrey H.·2014·Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3330
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3330

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Weer, C., & Greenhaus, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Salisbury University (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Weer, Christy
ORCID
Greenhaus, Jeffrey H.
Venue
Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published
2014
Pages
2210-2211
DOI
10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3330
OpenAlex
W4230931248
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
family-to-work conflict, family interference with work, work-family conflict, family responsibilities, work interruptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review