Interpretation, Conflict and Instruction in Online Multiplayer Games: Lessons from Warsong Gulch
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conflicts over meaning that arise during play in MMORPGs indicate that theories of textuality are relevant.
“Elsewhere I've argued that while MMORPGs are obviously social spaces, the conflicts over meaning that arise during play indicate that theories of textuality are relevant (Carr, 2012).”
From Methodology, Representation, and Games (2019) · cites this paper as Carr, 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methodology, Representation, and Games
Carr, D. (2019) · Games and Culture · doi:10.1177/1555412017728641 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Carr, D.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Carr, Diane
- ORCID
- Carr, Diane
- Venue
- Computer Games and New Media Cultures
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 411-424
- OpenAlex
- W134330896
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Keywords
- World of Warcraft, cooperative play, online multiplayer games, violence in games, textuality, online gaming communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
