Cited by 13Arctic and Russian Policy StudiesInternational Maritime Law IssuesCoastal and Marine Management

Political stability and multi-level governance in the Arctic

Stokke, Olav Schram·2013·NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-007-4713-5_26

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stokke, O. S.
Affiliations
Fridtjof Nansen Institute (NO)
Corresponding author
Stokke, Olav Schram
Venue
NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security
Published
2012-06-26
Pages
297-311
ISSN
  • 1874-6519 (ISSN-L)
  • 1874-6543
OpenAlex
W63024366
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.79
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
NATO science for peace and security series. C, Environmental security (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Maritime Law Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
Keywords
Arctic governance, political stability, multi-level governance, Arctic Council, UNCLOS, maritime boundaries, law of the sea, regional organizations, environmental security, Arctic environmental change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review