Cited by 5Indigenous Studies and EcologyIndigenous Peoples' Rights and LawCoastal and Marine Management

Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic

Open access
York, Abigail M., Zdor, Eduard, BurnSilver, Shauna, Degai, Tatiana, Monakhova, Maria, Isakova, Svetlana, Petrov, Andrey N., Kempf, Morgan·2022·Earth System Governance

Abstract

Oceans governance occurs through overlapping, multi-level institutions that often fail to recognize Indigenous sovereignty and self-determination. The International Whaling Commission (IWC) provides pathways for recognizing Indigenous rights. However, observed power asymmetries and cross-level local to international conflicts threatened subsistence rights and generated research and advocacy fatigue for Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities in the USA and Russia. We conduct an institutional analysis of Indigenous bowhead whaling governance based upon lived experiences of Indigenous authors, primary documents from co-management organizations, national agencies, the IWC, and extant literature. We explore how Indigenous co-management organizations increased sovereignty and self-determination for communities whose culture, identities, livelihoods, and origins are intimately connected to marine mammal hunting. Our study also provides lessons for the United Nations Decade for Ocean Science on the challenges of institutional navigation and the role of embodied resurgent practice amongst Indigenous communities within Earth system governance.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This paper analyzes multi-level Indigenous bowhead whaling governance in Alaska and Chukotka, showing how Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities navigated international, national, and subnational institutions to resist whaling restrictions and assert sovereignty. It argues that embodied resurgent practice and cross-level, cross-domain institutional navigation reshaped IWC Aboriginal subsistence whaling policy, culminating in automatic quota renewal in 2018.

Key findings

  • The IWC eliminated the exemption for Indigenous bowhead whaling in June 1977, extending the ban to Iñupiat and Saint Lawrence Island Yupik; the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC) formed in 1977 with nine North Slope and SLI Yupik whaling communities (now 11) and secured a temporary single-year quota of 18 harpoon strikes.
  • The AEWC became a regional co-management entity with NOAA in 1981; Indigenous and western scientific collaboration, including sonar-based counts, produced higher bowhead population estimates, and by 1986 the IWC recognized that standard techniques were undercounting whales.
  • A 1997 US–Russia bilateral agreement shared the bowhead quota, ending an effective ban on Indigenous bowhead whaling on the Russian side; Russian co-management organizations later shifted, with ChAZTO closed in 2019 and UMMH registered in 2009.
  • At the 67th IWC meeting in Brazil (2018), limited automatic renewal of all Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling catch/strike limit quotas was set in perpetuity; overall quota numbers had not changed for 26 years, and Mexico noted the stock was over 10,500 animals.

Methods

  • Qualitative institutional analysis of Indigenous bowhead whaling governance, based on lived experiences of Indigenous co-authors, primary documents from co-management organizations, national agencies, the IWC, and extant literature.
  • Authors searched digital IWC archives for decisions about the bowhead block quota, the bilateral US–Russia coalition, IWC consideration of Indigenous rights, and use of Indigenous knowledge and science in decision-making.
  • Analysis focused on international, national, subnational, and community levels across two periods: the exemption era and Indigenous whaling with IWC quotas (1977–present), tracing cross-level and cross-domain flows.

Limitations

  • Stated: the paper examines a single case and calls for comparative Earth system governance scholarship; it notes the hard-fought wins may be difficult to transfer to communities without similar resources and histories of collective action.
  • Stated: more place-based research is needed, and the authors frame the case as illustrative rather than broadly generalizable.
  • Evident: the analysis is qualitative and interpretive, relying on co-author lived experience, community narratives, participant observation, and archival documents, so it does not offer statistical generalization.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

18 of 131 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Collectivization and industrialization efforts significantly reduced local control over traditional hunting and whaling beginning in the 1930s.

    “Collectivization and industrialization efforts significantly reduced local control over traditional hunting and whaling beginning in the 1930s (Pelyasov et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pelyasov et al., 2017 source

      The traditional-sector section (p. 5) dates collectivization to the 1930s–1950s and describes strong state control of Chukotka’s traditional economy. It also says collectivization temporarily disrupted the link between reindeer herding and marine harvesting. It does not specifically establish reduced local control over hunting and whaling, or attribute such a reduction to industrialization. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    At the international level, Indigenous resistance and collective action shaped new norms of justice and human rights within the IWC.

    “At the international level, Indigenous resistance and collective action shaped new norms of justice and human rights within the IWC (like processes described by Lawless et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lawless et al., 2020 source
  • Interpretationcitation

    Local and regional actors and organizations leveraged arguments and strategies honed within larger Indigenous movements, such as those led by the ICC, and fought to ensure that the centrality of whaling to identity and sovereignty was not lost in numeric discussions of quotas, food security and whale numbers.

    “Looking back over this history of cross-level institutional navigation, local and regional actors and organizations leveraged arguments and strategies honed within larger Indigenous movements, such as those led by the ICC (Gerhardt, 2017;Sidorova, 2019;Young, 1996), and fought to ensure that the centrality of whaling to identity and sovereignty was not lost in numeric discussions of quotas, food”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gerhardt, 2017 source
    • cites Sidorova, 2019 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Young, 1996 source
  • Premisecitation

    Chukchi, Iñupiat, SLI Yupik, and Siberian Yupik community whaling communities' interests, knowledge, practices, and (sometimes) kin ties transcend nation-state boundaries.

    “Chukchi, Iñupiat, SLI Yupik, and Siberian Yupik community whaling communities' interests, knowledge, practices, and (sometimes) kin ties transcend nation-state boundaries (Huntington et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huntington et al., 2020 source

      Section 2 identifies Chukchi, Iñupiaq, and St. Lawrence Island or Siberian Yupik in the border-spanning Bering Strait region. Sections 2.1 and 5 describe family ties, shared culture, practices, and resource stewardship across national borders. The paper does not establish the more specific characterization of all these groups as whaling communities or describe their shared knowledge specifically in relation to whaling. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    These 1970s bowhead population estimates were inaccurate without inclusion of Indigenous science and knowledge.

    “However, these 1970s bowhead population estimates were inaccurate without inclusion of Indigenous science and knowledge (George et al., 1989).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites George et al., 1989 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) says that estimates made from 1977 to 1984 assumed whales would not migrate through the census area when the lead was closed, while Inupiat hunters had long known bowheads could break ice to breathe. The Ice-Breaking Behavior section reports that acoustic observations later revealed whales migrating under heavy ice, undermining that assumption. The paper does not establish that the estimates were inaccurate specifically because Indigenous knowledge was excluded. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 76
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 66
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    UNDRIP has been part of the conversation about the human right to whale and has been invoked by Arctic Indigenous communities in debates about whaling at the IWC.

    “The UN Declaration for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) also has been a part of the conversation about the human right to whale (Wold, 2017) and has been invoked by Arctic Indigenous communities in debates about whaling at the IWC (Coté, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wold, 2017
    • cites Coté, 2016 source

      Coté discusses UNDRIP and Indigenous rights in §2, and the cultural importance of Arctic Indigenous whaling in §3. Neither passage says Arctic Indigenous communities invoked UNDRIP in whaling debates at the IWC; searches for IWC, the International Whaling Commission, and that invocation found no such account. The separate human-right-to-whale clause is attributed to Wold, not Coté. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Arctic Indigenous communities developed complex and heterogenous local governance regimes, including extensive customary laws and practices that co-evolved with hunting over millennia.

    “Arctic Indigenous communities developed complex and heterogenous local governance regimes (Grey and Kuokkanen, 2020), including extensive customary laws and practices that co-evolved with hunting over millennia (Huntington et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Grey and Kuokkanen, 2020 source

      The indexed passage labelled “1560 Lataukset (Pure)” describes Indigenous peoples’ complex legal-political orders, anchored in particular lands, rights, values and practices, and discusses examples in Sápmi. It does not establish the broader claim that Arctic Indigenous communities generally developed heterogeneous local governance regimes. The customary-law and hunting clause is attributed to Huntington et al., not to Grey and Kuokkanen, and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Huntington et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Indigenous co-management entities continue to fight and reimagine new decision-making frameworks in multi-level environmental spaces and oceans-related governance systems.

    “Indigenous co-management entities continue to fight and reimagine new decision-making frameworks in multi-level environmental spaces and oceans-related governance systems (Grey & Kuokkanen, 2020;Maxwell et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Grey & Kuokkanen, 2020 source

      The retrieved passages are bibliographic records and an abstract, not passages from the paper’s body. Searches for Indigenous co-management decision-making, multilevel environmental governance, and oceans-related governance found no body-text passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Maxwell et al., 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Indigenous Peoples on both sides of the Bering Strait, Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island and Siberian Yupik, are closely connected historically through cultural, ethnic and family linkages, and ocean-based subsistence activities, many centered on human-whale connections, that sustained their livelihoods and cultures for generations.

    “The Indigenous Peoples on both sides of the Bering Strait, Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island (SLI) and Siberian Yupik, are closely connected historically through cultural, ethnic and family linkages, and ocean-based subsistence activities, many centered on human-whale connections, that sustained their livelihoods and cultures for generations (Huntington et al., 2020;Schweitzer and Golovko, 1”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Huntington et al., 2020 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Schweitzer and Golovko, 1995

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Iñupiat argued these estimates undercounted whales, because bowhead could push up under the ice to surface and breathe.

    “But Iñupiat argued these estimates undercounted whales, because bowhead could push up under the ice to surface and breathe (George et al., 1989).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites George et al., 1989 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) says Iñupiat hunters knew bowheads could break sea ice to breathe and that earlier population estimates assumed whales would not migrate through closed leads. The Ice-Breaking Behavior section (page unavailable) reports that ice obscured whales from visual observers. The paper does not say that Iñupiat argued the estimates undercounted whales. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Whaling is permitted through the rights of the Federal Law On guarantees of the rights of the Indigenous Peoples of the Russian Federation, which extends a Soviet period 1926 law.

    “Whaling is permitted through the rights of the Federal Law “On guarantees of the rights of the Indigenous Peoples of the Russian Federation'', which extends a Soviet period 1926 law that emphasized korenizatsiia (Indigenization processes for local languages, local leaders and ethnic schools) setting a precedent for support and regulation of small Indigenous communities (Sidorova, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sidorova, 2019 source

      The Russia section describes korenizatsiia as a 1920s Soviet policy involving Indigenous languages, local leaders, and ethnic schools. Table 1 lists a 1926 statute granting protection and special status to small-numbered Indigenous peoples. Neither passage says that the named Russian federal law extends the 1926 statute or that it permits whaling. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    After the fall of the Soviet Union, the local economy collapsed in Chukotka and food insecurity became widespread.

    “After the fall of the Soviet Union, the local economy collapsed in Chukotka and food insecurity became widespread (Kozlov, 2004;McNeill, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kozlov, 2004 source

      The Introduction places substantial economic changes after the Soviet Union’s dissolution, and the Conclusion describes an economic collapse that pushed many indigenous northerners toward subsistence. The Changes in food consumption section documents a shift from market to local foods, but it does not establish that food insecurity became widespread; the Changes in food preferences section reports insufficient access to marine mammal products for some respondents, while others said their needs were met. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites McNeill, 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Increased hunting of marine mammals by local crews enabled communities to exercise traditional practice and ways of life, but also provided much-needed, cheaper accessible local foods during a period of significant stress and economic instability.

    “Increased hunting of marine mammals by local crews enabled communities to exercise traditional practice and ways of life, but also provided much-needed, cheaper accessible local foods during a period of significant stress and economic instability (Kozlov, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kozlov, 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Red Data Book of Endangered Species includes bowhead whales with conservation status 1.

    “The Red Data Book of Endangered Species includes bowhead whales (conservation status 1) (Filatova et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Filatova et al., 2022 source

      Table 1 lists bowhead whales in the Russian Red Book, but assigns category 1 only to the Okhotsk Sea population; the Bering–Chukchi–Beaufort population is category 5. The Calculation of encounter rates section defines category 1 as endangered. The claim omits the population distinction and thus overgeneralizes the category 1 status. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The IWC bowhead quota is partially determined by community need and partially on the status of and risks to the bowhead whale population.

    “The IWC bowhead quota is partially determined by community need and partially on the status of and risks to the bowhead whale population (Gambell, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gambell, 1993 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The IWC exemption for Indigenous whaling was eliminated in 1977.

    “Cross-level whaling governance in Russia and the USA from 1930 to 1977, when the IWC exemption for Indigenous whaling was eliminated (central orange box), and from 1977 to 2018, when Indigenous rights to whale were advocated for on the international stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    USSR and Canada agreed to cooperate on a research program.

    “Resolution for USA-led science and management of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A resolution established USA-led science and management of bowhead on an annual schedule and ceiling for strikes and landed set by IWC.

    “Resolution for USA-led science and management of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The overall quota numbers have not changed for 26 years.

    “Notably, the overall quota numbers have not changed for 26 years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    A resolution restricts the hunt to persons under jurisdiction of the Government of the United States.

    “Amendment to Schedule paragraph 11 that had”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    In 1978, the total bowhead quota was a maximum of 18 strikes or up to 12 whales landed.

    “1978 | Maximum of 18 strikes or up to 12 | Maximum of 18 strikes or up to 12 | - | Deleted”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Amendment to Schedule paragraph 11 had focused on Indigenous hunts in Greenland.

    “Amendment to Schedule paragraph 11 that had”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The prior schedule provided Aboriginal rights to hunt 'right' whales.

    “Deleted”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The amendment now includes language on bowhead whales from Bering Sea stock taken by 'aborigines'.

    “Amendment to Schedule paragraph 11 that had”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    From 1977 to 2018, Indigenous rights to whale were advocated for on the international stage.

    “Cross-level whaling governance in Russia and the USA from 1930 to 1977, when the IWC exemption for Indigenous whaling was eliminated (central orange box), and from 1977 to 2018, when Indigenous rights to whale were advocated for on the international stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    These techniques validated Indigenous understanding and led to much higher population estimates.

    “These techniques validated Indigenous understanding -and led to much higher population estimates (Albert, 2001;Huntington, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Albert, 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Huntington, 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    USSR or Canada Indigenous peoples also hunt bowhead.

    “Amendment to Schedule paragraph 11 that had”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, block quota numbers slowly increased, generally with longer periods of time and more flexibility.

    “Throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, block quota numbers slowly increased, generally with longer periods of time and more flexibility (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table 1

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In December 1977, a temporary quota was agreed.

    “Deleted”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    A resolution provided six factors for a community needs assessment to be led by the USA and presented in 1981.

    “Resolution for USA-led science and management of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    From 1981 to 1983, the total bowhead quota was a maximum of 65 strikes or 45 whales landed for a three-year period, provided no more than 17 whales landed per year.

    “1981-1983 | Maximum of 65 strikes or 45 whales | Maximum of 65 strikes or 45 whales | | |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In 1979, the total bowhead quota was a maximum of 18 strikes or up to 12 whales landed.

    “1979 | Maximum of 18 strikes or up to 12 | Maximum of 18 strikes or up to 12 | - | Amendment to Schedule paragraph 11 that had”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In 1980, the total bowhead quota was a maximum of 27 strikes or up to 18 whales landed for a 1-year period.

    “1980 | Maximum of 27 strikes or up to 18 | Maximum of 27 strikes or up to 18 | - | Resolution for USA-led science and management of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Oceans governance exemplifies multi-level governance with multiple government and non-governmental entities engaging in policymaking and decision-making across jurisdictions.

    “Thus, oceans governance exemplifies multi-level governance with multiple government and non-governmental entities engaging in policymaking and decision-making across jurisdictions (Hooghe and Marks, 2003;Stephenson, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hooghe and Marks, 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Stephenson, 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CITES and UNCLOS both regulate trade of whales and their conservation.

    “The Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) both regulate trade of whales and their conservation (Fitzmaurice, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fitzmaurice, 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In the US, Indigenous whaling largely remained outside of federal level surveillance and control until the 1970s.

    “In the US, Indigenous whaling largely remained outside of federal level surveillance and control until the 1970s.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Inuit Circumpolar Council currently operates across the circumpolar North, including in Russia.

    “The ICC currently operates across the circumpolar North, including in Russia (Shadian, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shadian, 2014
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 1969 a professional whale-hunting ship was put into use, although the IWC did not know about the use of whale for fur farms.

    “In 1969 a professional whale-hunting ship was put into use (although the IWC did not know about the use of whale for fur farms and this became a point of global debate in later years (Jones, 2019)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jones, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Integration of Indigenous knowledge and entities within comanagement regimes may reproduce settler colonial structures.

    “Integration of Indigenous knowledge and entities within comanagement regimes may reproduce settler colonial structures (Charlie, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Charlie, 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    During the 1970s, Indigenous leaders organized around a larger entity, now known as the North Slope Borough, to advocate for villages and Indigenous Peoples, drawing upon and leading Alaska Native civil rights actions, Indigenous rights movements in the USA, and the 1973 establishment of the transnational Inuit Circumpolar Council in Utqiaġvik.

    “During the 1970s, Indigenous leaders organized around a larger entity, now known as the North Slope Borough, to advocate for villages and Indigenous Peoples drawing upon and leading Alaska Native civil rights actions (Sakakibara, 2020), Indigenous rights movements in the USA, and the 1973 establishment of the transnational Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) in Utqia ġvik (known then as Barrow) (Fig.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sakakibara, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Entities working with state agencies face burdens associated with the failure of many western science-oriented ecosystem governance systems to understand, accept, and incorporate Indigenous science and knowledge.

    “Those entities working with state agencies face burdens associated with the failure of many western science-oriented ecosystem governance systems to understand, accept, and incorporate Indigenous science and knowledge (Watson, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Watson, 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The newly formed Inuit Circumpolar Council focused on transnational Inuit identities and pushed back against Western political imaginaries.

    “The newly formed ICC focused on transnational Inuit identities and pushed back against Western political imaginaries (Gerhardt, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gerhardt, 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The ICRW established the IWC as the governing body to maintain whale stocks; early on the conservation focus was for commercial whaling.

    “The ICRW established the International Whaling Commission (IWC) as the governing body to maintain whale stocks; early on the conservation focus was for commercial whaling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The 1936 Alaska Indian Reorganization Act led to the recognition of 229 Alaska Native tribal entities.

    “However, the 1936 Alaska Indian Reorganization Act, an amendment to the 1934 Indian Reorganization Act, led to the recognition of 229 Alaska Native tribal entities (Den Ouden and O'Brien, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Den Ouden and O'Brien, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In northern coastal communities, settlements provided monies to outfit new whaling crews, which led to an increase in whaling.

    “In northern coastal communities, settlements provided monies to outfit new whaling crews, which led to an increase in whaling (Conrad, 1989;Huntington, 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Conrad, 1989 source
    • cites Huntington, 1992 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By the end of the 1960s, sovkhozy replaced all kolkhozy, and the Soviet government began to introduce fur farms and use marine mammal meat as food for fur animals.

    “By the end of the 1960s, sovkhozy replaced all kolkhozy (Khakhovskaya, 2011, p. 119), and the Soviet government began to introduce fur farms and use marine mammal meat as food for fur animals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Khakhovskaya, 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Inherent tensions revolve around histories of colonialism, including scientific colonialism, and questions of sovereignty and authority.

    “Thus, inherent tensions revolve around histories of colonialism (including scientific colonialism) and questions of sovereignty and authority.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Institutions in one environmental space affect another; overlapping international treaties can be characterized as embedded, nested, or clustered.

    “Frequently, institutions in one environmental space affect another; Young (1996) characterized overlapping international treaties as embedded, nested, or clustered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Young (1996) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Indigenous institutions, including long-enduring rules and norms and more recent practices of Indigenous sovereignty and self-determination, exist within a multi-level governance system.

    “Indigenous institutions, including long-enduring rules and norms and more recent practices of Indigenous sovereignty and self-determination, exist within a multi-level governance system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The IWC was considered largely ineffective until additional multi-lateral environmental agreements were adopted and the US used unilateral action through the Pelly and Packwood-Magnuson Amendments.

    “The IWC was considered largely ineffective until additional multi-lateral environmental agreements were adopted (Fitzmaurice, 2013) and the US used unilateral action through the Pelly and Packwood-Magnuson Amendments (Caron, 1995 and see further discussion below).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fitzmaurice, 2013 source
    • cites Caron, 1995 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Whaling governance is an important component of oceans governance, providing examples of the earliest bi-lateral oceans agreements among modern nation-states and long-enduring Indigenous governance systems.

    “Whaling governance is an important component of oceans governance -providing examples of the earliest bi-lateral oceans agreements amongst modern nation-states (Deal and Tomlins, 2016;Sellheim, 2020) and long enduring Indigenous governance systems (Huntington et al., 2021;Sakakibara, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Deal and Tomlins, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sellheim, 2020 source
    • cites Huntington et al., 2021 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Oceans governance extends beyond national boundaries and includes multiple policy domains.

    “Oceans governance extends beyond national boundaries and includes multiple policy domains (Shivakoti et al., 2021;Stokke, 2013;Young, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Shivakoti et al., 2021 source
    • cites Stokke, 2013 source
    • cites Young, 1996 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The ICRW signed in 1946 protected many whale species by limiting whaling activities.

    “The International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) signed in 1946 protected many whale species by limiting whaling ac-tivities (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Simpson developed a concept of embodied resurgent practice whereby everyday practices of living and being as Indigenous Peoples are forms of resistance disrupting the settler colonial state.

    “Indigenous scholar Simpson (2017), building on resurgence scholarship (Hunt and Holmes, 2015), developed a complementary concept of embodied resurgent practice whereby everyday practices of living and being as Indigenous Peoples are forms of resistance disrupting the settler colonial state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Simpson (2017)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hunt and Holmes, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Oceans and whaling governance occurs through institutions, defined as rules, norms, and shared strategies, that shape human decisions at all levels.

    “Oceans and whaling governance, like governance more generally, occurs through institutions (defined as rules, norms, and shared strategies (Ostrom, 2005)) that shape human decisions at all levels, from individual and household behaviors to nations joining international agreements (York et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ostrom, 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites York et al., 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Observed power asymmetries and cross-level local to international conflicts threatened subsistence rights and generated research and advocacy fatigue for Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities in the USA and Russia.

    “However, observed power asymmetries and cross-level local to international conflicts threatened subsistence rights and generated research and advocacy fatigue for Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities in the USA and Russia.”
    • Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
      “Yet, observed power asymmetries and cross-level local to international conflicts threatened subsistence rights and institutions and generated research and advocacy fatigue (Lubell and Morrison, 2021) for Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island (SLI) Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lubell and Morrison, 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While the non-Indigenous crew of Zvezdny was making use of the catch quota allocated to the Soviet Union, the Indigenous population was losing their traditional whale hunting skills and associated customary laws.

    “While the non-Indigenous crew of “Zvezdny'' was making use of the catch quota allocated to the Soviet Union, the Indigenous population was losing their traditional whale hunting skills and associated customary laws.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The United States ceased treaty-making with Indigenous nations in 1871, shortly after the 1867 Treaty of Cessation with the transfer of Alaskan territory from Russia to the United States.

    “The United States ceased treaty-making with Indigenous nations in 1871 (Berger, 1985), shortly after the 1867 Treaty of Cessation with the transfer of Alaskan territory from Russia to the United States (Case and Dorough, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Berger, 1985

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Case and Dorough, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Obligations in one treaty affect another.

    “Like many international treaties, obligations in one treaty affect another (Young 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Young 1996 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    International conservation focuses on settler states' priorities and scientific knowledge, often leading to Indigenous communities' fatigue, especially associated with continuous demands for research and advocacy.

    “The case illustrates how international conservation focuses on settler states' priorities and scientific knowledge often leading to Indigenous communities' fatigue, especially associated with continuous demands for research and advocacy (see Lubell and Morrison, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lubell and Morrison, 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    To meet growing demand, the USSR began to centralize hunts on commercial whaling vessels in the 1940s, which was acknowledged and supported by the 1946 IWC Convention.

    “To meet growing demand, the USSR began to centralize hunts on commercial whaling vessels in the 1940s -this was acknowledged and supported by the 1946 IWC Convention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    New forms of Indigenous-led governance in Alaska emerged as Alaska became a state in 1959 and the federal government attempted to resolve Indigenous claims to lands through the Alaska Native Settlement Claims Act in 1971.

    “New forms of Indigenous-led governance in Alaska emerged as Alaska became a state (1959) and the federal government attempted to resolve Indigenous claims to lands from time immemorial through the passage of the Alaska Native Settlement Claims Act (ANCSA) in 1971 (Berger, 1985).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Berger, 1985

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    ANCSA provided funds, mechanisms to fund community infrastructure, and granted economic self-determination through newly formed village and regional corporations.

    “ANCSA provided much-needed funds, mechanisms to fund community infrastructure and granted economic self-determination through newly formed village and regional corporations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Within polycentric governance systems, actors strategically navigate to join, create, resist, or adapt existing institutions, which Lubell and Morrison call institutional navigation.

    “Within polycentric governance systems, actors strategically navigate to join, create, resist, or adapt existing institutions, what Lubell and Morrison (2021) call institutional navigation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lubell and Morrison (2021) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In Chukotka, hunters could only hunt by order of the sovkhoz authority; the sovkhoz sent hunters out to hunt with permission granted from the Federal Ministry of Fisheries and the Border Guard Service.

    “In Chukotka, hunters could only hunt by order of the sovkhoz authority; the sovkhoz sent hunters out to hunt with permission granted from the Federal Ministry of Fisheries and the Border Guard Service.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Investigating the whaling policy space provides lessons for multi-level oceans governance more broadly and contributes to the goals of the UN Ocean Decade.

    “Investigating the whaling policy space provides lessons for multi-level oceans governance more broadly and contributes to the goals of the UN Ocean Decade.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Aboriginal subsistence hunting was initially exempted from oversight, but a growing environmental movement in the 1960s and 1970s led to a moratorium on commercial whaling and the IWC's focus on Indigenous whaling.

    ““Aboriginal subsistence” hunting was initially exempted from oversight (Sellheim, 2020), but a growing environmental movement in the 1960s and 1970s (as reflected by CITES) led to a moratorium on commercial whaling and IWC's focus on Indigenous whaling (Schiffman, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sellheim, 2020 source
    • cites Schiffman, 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Recent Russian efforts to repress Indigenous rights reduced engagement internationally and bi-nationally.

    “But recent Russian efforts to repress Indigenous rights reduced engagement internationally and bi-nationally.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Whaling across this vast area is characterized by significant cultural, organizational and institutional diversity, but one thing is common to all whaling: it is a social effort led by captains and crews that ultimately provides bowhead to more than one whaling household, one crew or one community.

    “Whaling across this vast area is characterized by significant cultural, organizational and institutional diversity, but one thing is common to all whaling -it is a social effort led by captains and crews that ultimately provides bowhead to more than one whaling household, one crew or one community (Fig. 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    From 1992 Chukotka scientists also collaborated with the North Slope Borough Wildlife Department on bowhead population estimates; later Russian Indigenous hunters provided additional shore-based observations.

    “Corresponding with the period of Perestroika and a thawing of the “ice curtain”, from 1992 Chukotka scientists also collaborated with the North Slope Borough Wildlife Department on bowhead population estimates; later Russian Indigenous hunters provided additional shore-based observations (Aho and Meek, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aho and Meek, 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Collectively, through these mechanisms, US and Chukotka whale hunters advanced their interests through both institutional navigations up to the IWC and embodied resurgent practice at home.

    “Collectively, through these mechanisms, US and Chukotka whale hunters advanced their interests through both institutional navigations up to the IWC and embodied resurgent practice at home.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In the USSR, efforts to navigate collectivization and maintain multi-generational knowledge or in Russia's current domestic political turmoil, resurrecting village-based whaling are acts of resistance.

    “In the USSR, efforts to navigate collectivization and maintain multi-generational knowledge or in Russia's current domestic political turmoil, resurrecting village-based whaling are acts of resistance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Marine mammals account for the majority of sharing from households.

    “Marine mammals account for the majority of sharing from households.Adapted from figure in(Kofinas et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kofinas et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    These epistemologies, underpinned by the values of dominant settler colonial states helming the IWC, initially led to collapse of whale populations and then restricted peoples who have sustainably whaled for millennia.

    “The sad irony is that these epistemologies, underpinned by the values of dominant settler colonial states helming the IWC, initially led to collapse of whale populations and then restricted peoples who have sustainably whaled for millennia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Indigenous peoples have sustainably whaled for millennia.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In the US and Russia, the financial requirements and physical risks associated with small boat whaling are constant.

    “In the US and Russia, the financial requirements and physical risks associated with small boat whaling are constant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The bar set by the IWC in 1977, requiring four decades of cross-level and crossborder alliance building and institutional navigation, and prohibitively expensive, non-stop, cultural translational advocacy is extremely high.

    “Indigenous resistance will, of course, continue through practice, advocacy, legal action, and diplomacy, but the bar set by the IWC in 1977, requiring four decades of cross-level and crossborder alliance building and institutional navigation, and prohibitively expensive, non-stop, cultural translational advocacy is extremely high.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This collective action reinforced political engagement within Russia, bi-national and international diplomacy, whaling comanagement, and increased engagement with Indigenous solidarity movements.

    “This collective action reinforced political engagement within Russia, bi-national and international diplomacy, whaling comanagement, and increased engagement with Indigenous solidarity movements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The ongoing conflict with Ukraine, and resultant Russian isolation, has increased uncertainty about the future of the US-Russian co-management efforts.

    “Further, the ongoing conflict with Ukraine, and resultant Russian isolation, has increased uncertainty about the future of the US-Russian co-management efforts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Similarly in the US, prioritizing resources and capacity for scientific engagement and legal battles, while keeping whaling vibrant in communities across generations are acts of resistance.

    “Similarly in the US, prioritizing resources and capacity for scientific engagement and legal battles, while keeping whaling vibrant in communities across generations are acts of resistance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These resources supported the legal and scientific work that transformed co-management of whaling and reshaped the international whaling regime.

    “These resources supported the legal and scientific work that transformed co-management of whaling and reshaped the international whaling regime.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Russian Federation requested consideration for a bowhead quota in 1995; ultimately a quota was made available to Chukchi and Siberian Yupik communities through the bilateral agreement in 1997.

    “Then the Russian Federation requested consideration for a bowhead quota in 1995 (International Whaling Commission, 1996); ultimately a quota was made available to Chukchi and Siberian Yupik communities through the bilateral agreement in 1997.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites International Whaling Commission, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The US opted not to file an objection, which would have made the change non-binding in the US.

    “The US opted not to file an objection, which would have made the change non-binding in the US, and therefore have no effect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The AEWC organized initially to sue the US, Adams v. Vance; their suit was unsuccessful, but the US was concerned about further legal action related to the Whaling Convention Act of 1949.

    “The AEWC organized initially to sue the US, Adams v. Vance (Mason, 1977); their suit was unsuccessful, but the US was concerned about further legal action related to the Whaling Convention Act of 1949.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mason, 1977

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    There is frustration that international conservation continues to focus on settler states' priorities and scientific knowledge, even as currently low whale populations are largely due to historic decimation by settler states, whalers and multinational companies.

    “There is frustration that international conservation continues to focus on settler states' priorities and scientific knowledge, even as currently low whale populations are largely due to historic decimation -by settler states, whalers and multinational companies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Currently low whale populations are largely due to historic decimation by settler states, whalers and multinational companies.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Although the cases in the US and Russia are distinct, there are similarities in influences across domains (economic, legal, political) and levels, as well as emerging cooperation between the nations and reemergence of cooperation among Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island and Siberian Yupik.

    “Although the cases in the US and Russia are distinct, there are similarities in influences across domains (economic, legal, political) and levels, as well as emerging cooperation between the nations and reemergence of cooperation among Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island (SLI) and Siberian Yupik.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The state provides hunting supplies and storage facilities and subsidizes the whaling obshchiny in Chukotka.

    “The state provides hunting supplies (boats, weapons, gear) and storage facilities (Zdor, 2021) and subsidize, through monthly state salaries to hunters and support for the purchase of whaling equipment, the whaling obshchiny in Chukotka (Kolomiets, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Zdor, 2021 source
    • cites Kolomiets, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In recent years this funding has been significantly reduced generating concern about the ability of the AEWC to maintain high levels of research, legal, and diplomatic activities.

    “Yet in recent years this funding has been significantly reduced generating concern about the ability of the AEWC to maintain high levels of research, legal, and diplomatic activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Chukotka established a marine mammal hunting school to promote hunting practices for the younger generation in 2020.

    “Chukotka established a marine mammal hunting school to promote hunting practices for the younger generation in 2020 (TACC, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites TACC, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The US-Japan conflict stemmed from Japanese desire to reopen commercial whaling and small-scale subsistence whaling.

    “The US-Japan conflict stemmed from Japanese desire to reopen commercial whaling (Stoett, 1997) and small-scale subsistence whaling (Freeman, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Stoett, 1997

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Freeman, 1993 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The USSR prohibited those under 14 years old from participating in hunting, which curtailed multi-generational knowledge sharing.

    “The USSR also prohibited those under 14 years old from participating in hunting, which curtailed multi-generational knowledge sharing (Kerttula, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kerttula, 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Despite this, Indigenous communities must still demonstrate that future engagement in core cultural practices that have been sustainable for millennia, will not harm whale populations.

    “Despite this, Indigenous communities must still demonstrate that future engagement in core cultural practices that have been sustainable for millennia, will not harm whale populations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Indigenous peoples have sustainably whaled for millennia.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Without multi-level resistance by communities, rights to whale would have been erased within an international regime dominated by western scientific practices, epistemologies, and conservation values.

    “Without multi-level resistance by communities, rights to whale would have been erased within an international regime dominated by western scientific practices, epistemologies, and conservation values.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While there was no specific law prohibiting traditional whaling by Russian Indigenous Peoples, there was a de facto restriction through the sovkhoz and domination of IWC quota by Zvezdny, and marine mammal hunter age restrictions that limited the ability to pass on multi-generational knowledge.

    “Thus, while there was no specific law prohibiting traditional whaling by Russian Indigenous Peoples, there was a de facto restriction through the sovkhoz and domination of IWC quota by the “Zvezdny,” and marine mammal hunter age restrictions that limited the ability to pass on multi-generational knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In December 1977 the US returned to the IWC to request a small quota and improved monitoring.

    “Thus, in December 1977 the US returned to IWC to request a small quota and improved monitoring.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Chukchi, Iñupiat, SLI Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities exemplified embodied resurgent practice through living and maintaining cultural practices, knowledge, and livelihoods that connect people, the sea and whales in both the past, now, and into the future.

    “Chukchi, Iñupiat, SLI Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities exemplified embodied resurgent practice through living and maintaining cultural practices, knowledge, and livelihoods that connect people, the sea and whales in both the past, now, and into the future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Early on, the IWC repeatedly pushed for low single year quotas, notably advocating against using acoustic-based scientific methods that would increase the bowhead population numbers and focusing on the inefficiency of bowhead whale hunts.

    “Early on, the IWC repeatedly pushed for low single year quotas, notably advocating against using acoustic-based scientific methods that would increase the bowhead population numbers and focusing on the inefficiency of bowhead whale hunts (strikes relative to landed whales) (International Whaling Commission, 1983).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites International Whaling Commission, 1983

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the following years, the IWC created a new category of Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling, with an associated subcommittee, the ASW Working Group.

    “In the following years, the IWC created a new category of Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling (ASW), with an associated subcommittee, the ASW Working Group (Alexander, 2013) (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alexander, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The inclusion of Aboriginal Subsistence hunts and IWC restriction of bowhead whaling shifted the locus of policy action significantly, whereby local Indigenous communities resisted and advocated for critical rights through embodied resurgent practice, collective action, and multi-level institutional navigation.

    “The inclusion of Aboriginal Subsistence hunts and IWC restriction of bowhead whaling shifted the locus of policy action significantly, whereby local Indigenous communities resisted and advocated for critical rights (Fig. 2) through embodied resurgent practice, collective action, and multi-level institutional navigation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In this process, science played the role of both ally and uneasy arbiter of species population health, cultural integrity, and human need.

    “In this process, science played the role of both ally and uneasy arbiter of species population health, cultural integrity, and human need.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The AEWC emerged as a regional body for discourse building upon local Iñupiat and SLI Yupik whaling governance and connected to ICC and pan-Arctic Indigenous movements.

    “The AEWC emerged as a regional body for discourse building upon local Iñupiat and SLI Yupik whaling governance and connected to ICC and pan-Arctic Indigenous movements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    With the fall of the Soviet Union, growing food insecurity fueled cross-border cooperation with SLI Yupik and Iñupiat restoring historic whaling community ties and driving reemergence of local hunting.

    “Likewise, with the fall of the Soviet Union, growing food insecurity fueled cross-border cooperation with SLI Yupik and Iñupiat restoring historic whaling community ties and driving reemergence of local hunting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    After the fall of the USSR, Chukotka whale hunters were able to forge new relationships with AEWC through the new bi-lateral agreement.

    “After the fall of the USSR, Chukotka whale hunters were able to forge new relationships with AEWC through the new bi-lateral agreement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Quota determinations and implementation reflected dynamism of the governance process in terms of bi-national coordination and conflict, changing national political and economic contexts and subnational co-management governance, shifting whaling politics, and understanding of obligations to other treaties, such as UNDRIP.

    “Quota determinations and implementation reflected dynamism of the governance process in terms of bi-national coordination and conflict, changing national political and economic contexts and subnational co-management governance (especially in Russia), shifting whaling politics, and understanding of obligations to other treaties, such as UNDRIP with a strengthened focus on Indigenous rights within”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In the Soviet Union, the Ministry of Natural Resources implemented the 1946 IWC Convention.

    “In the Soviet Union, the Ministry of Natural Resources implemented the 1946 IWC Convention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Soviet proposal did not pass, but the IWC granted a temporary single-year quota in 1977 for 18 harpoon strikes for Iñupiat and Saint Lawrence Island Yupik.

    “The Soviet proposal did not pass, but the IWC granted a temporary single-year quota in 1977 for 18 harpoon strikes for Iñupiat and SLI Yupik (Reeves, 2002) (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reeves, 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Arctic Indigenous whaling occurs during seasonal spring or fall efforts by crews, made up of related or unrelated individuals and led by boat captains and their wives/partners, who hunt migrating bowhead whales using small craft.

    “Arctic Indigenous whaling occurs during seasonal spring or fall efforts by crews, made up of related (or unrelated) individuals and led by boat captain(s) 8 and their wives/partners, who hunt migrating bowhead whales using small craft.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The IWC's decision to eliminate the exemption for Aboriginal subsistence whaling of bowhead whales, and the US inaction in filing an objection, extended the whaling ban to Iñupiat and Saint Lawrence Island Yupik.

    “The IWC's decision to eliminate the exemption for Aboriginal subsistence whaling of bowhead whales, and the US inaction in filing an objection, extended the whaling ban to Iñupiat and SLI Yupik (Mason 1977;Reeves 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mason 1977

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Reeves 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The North Slope Borough Department of Wildlife, staffed by Indigenous and western scientists, incorporated the knowledge of elders and whaling captains and conducted new population counts using both sight and sonar technology.

    “The North Slope Borough Department of Wildlife staffed by Indigenous and western scientists, incorporated the knowledge of elders and whaling captains and conducted new population counts using both sight and sonar technology (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The deletion of 'right' whales from the prior schedule effectively created a moratorium on bowhead hunting at the June 1977 meeting.

    “Deleted”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 1987, the USSR requested that they receive 3-5 bowhead whales to support Chukotka communities, but this was not approved.

    “In 1987, the USSR requested that they receive 3-5 bowhead whales to support Chukotka communities (International Whaling Commission, 1988), but this was not approved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites International Whaling Commission, 1988

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Political security risks in Russia exist for individuals and Indigenous groups and whaling obshchiny deal with sometimes adversarial administration agencies and safety risks due to generational losses of whaling practice and skill.

    “Political security risks in Russia exist for individuals and Indigenous groups and whaling obshchiny deal with sometimes adversarial administration agencies and safety risks due to generational losses of whaling practice and skill.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Chukotka, bowhead whales were the primary species hunted until the mid-20th century.

    “In Chukotka, bowhead whales were the primary species hunted until the mid-20th century (Krupnik, 1987).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Krupnik, 1987 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Representatives from the AEWC and North Slope Borough argued that 18 whales harvested was the minimum necessary for subsistence; the Soviet Union supported this with a proposal granting a quota of 18 landed whales and offered use of their commercial whaling ships to reduce the loss of whales struck but not captured; the US representatives declined the use of the Soviet whaling ship.

    “Representatives from the AEWC and North Slope Borough argued that 18 whales harvested was the minimum necessary for subsistence; the Soviet Union supported this with a proposal granting a quota of 18 landed whalesand offered use of their commercial whaling ships to reduce the loss of whales struck but not captured -the US representatives declined the use of the Soviet whaling ship (Camerino, 1978”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Camerino, 1978

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This has been combined with impressive legal and diplomatic strategies positioning the AEWC as a central policy actor.

    “This has been combined with impressive legal and diplomatic strategies positioning the AEWC, as a central policy actor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While Indigenous hunters resumed whaling with small boats, there was partial loss of multi-generational knowledge during the Soviet Era, and renewed hunting resulted in several accidents and deaths in Chukchi communities.

    “While Indigenous hunters resumed whaling with small boats, there was partial loss of multi-generational knowledge during the Soviet Era, and renewed hunting resulted in several accidents and deaths in Chukchi communities (Zdor, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zdor, 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The denial of the five-year block quota for the bowhead whale in May 2002 hinged on uncertainties surrounding subpopulations of the bowhead and environmental risks, such as those related to energy development, as well as ongoing political disagreements particularly with Japan.

    “The denial hinged on uncertainties surrounding subpopulations of the bowhead and environmental risks, such as those related to energy development, as well as ongoing political disagreements particularly with Japan 11 (International Whaling Commission, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites International Whaling Commission, 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The AEWC built legal representation with personnel based in Washington DC, collaborated with scientists when interests aligned, and financed the travel of commissioners to AEWC and IWC meetings.

    “The AEWC built legal representation with personnel based in Washington DC, collaborated with scientists when interests aligned, and financed the travel of commissioners to AEWC and IWC meetings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Domestic changes in Russia, including changes in governorship and freedom to engage in political speech, limited Indigenous resistance in more visible ways, and so too did lack of economic resources.

    “Domestic changes in Russia, including changes in governorship and freedom to engage in political speech, limited Indigenous resistance in more visible ways, and so too did lack of economic resources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Nine North Slope and Saint Lawrence Island Yupik whaling communities created the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission in 1977 to resist the whaling moratorium; the AEWC now includes 11 communities.

    “Nine North Slope and SLI Yupik whaling communities created the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC) in 1977 to resist the whaling moratorium -the AEWC now includes 11 communities (Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission, n.d.).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission, n.d.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The same method has been applied five additional times to calculate the need for bowhead, in '91, '94, '97, '02, '07 and '12.

    “The same method has been applied five additional times to calculate the need for bowhead, in '91, '94, '97, '02, '07 and '12 (Stephen R. Braund & Associates, 2012;2007, 2002, 1997, 1994, 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stephen R. Braund & Associates, 2012;2007, 2002, 1997, 1994, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In following years, Sweden furthered the new discourse by referencing UNDRIP, and Switzerland used UNDRIP to frame understanding of collective rights and international treaties.

    “In following years, Sweden furthered the new discourse by referencing the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) (International Whaling Commission, 2009), and Switzerland used UNDRIP to frame understanding of collective rights and international treaties (International Whaling Commission, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites International Whaling Commission, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites International Whaling Commission, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    US communities face strains associated with extended travel and advocacy with audiences that are uneducated and sometimes overtly hostile to Indigenous whaling.

    “US communities face strains associated with extended travel and advocacy with audiences that are uneducated and sometimes overtly hostile to Indigenous whalingall those engaging”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Community members, crews, captains, and commissioners' embodied resurgent practices are acts of resistance and integral to multi-level whaling governance.

    “Community members, crews, captains, and commissioners' embodied resurgent practices are acts of resistance and integral to multi-level whaling governance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Until 1977, Indigenous bowhead whaling in Beringia existed outside the international regime, but domestic nation-state policies affected who was considered Indigenous and affected coastal communities' economic and political self-determination.

    “Until 1977, Indigenous bowhead whaling in Beringia existed outside the international regime, but domestic nation-state policies affected who and the Kuugmiut, coastal marine people of the Kuk River both settled at Ul ġuniq, named as Wainwright Inlet for the first non-native people to travel the lagoon in 1826. 5USSR is reported to have illegally caught bowhead in the Okhotsk Sea throughout the 196”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    North Slope Borough leaders, historically whaling captains or their partners themselves, were able to leverage their position and networks, staff a wildlife department, and provide resources to support the AEWC.

    “North Slope Borough leaders, historically whaling captains or their partners themselves, were able to leverage their position and networks, staff a wildlife department, and provide resources to support the AEWCsocial capital (and simply resources) were critical (see similar discussion in Lubell and Morrison, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lubell and Morrison, 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Resistance on the Chukotka side has been hidden in some ways, but Indigenous peoples maintained their whaling practices throughout incredibly turbulent political periods.

    “Resistance on the Chukotka side has been hidden in some ways, but Indigenous peoples maintained their whaling practices throughout incredibly turbulent political periods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
121 of 121
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Indigenous peoples have sustainably whaled for millennia.

    “restricted peoples who have sustainably whaled for millennia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Currently low whale populations are largely due to historic decimation by settler states, whalers and multinational companies.

    “even as currently low whale populations are largely due to historic decimation -by settler states, whalers and multinational companies.”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • IWC is expanded in two different ways

    Minor

    The main text defines IWC as the International Whaling Commission, while the figure abbreviations define it as the International Whaling Convention.

  • Five additional need assessments are listed as six

    Minor

    The paper says the method was applied five additional times, but lists six years: 1991, 1994, 1997, 2002, 2007, and 2012.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Alexander, 2013, International whaling convention (IWC) and legal issues related to aboriginal rights note, Int. Whal. Conv. IWC Leg. Issues Relat. Aborig. Rights
  2. Allaway, 2005, ANCSA unrealized: our lives are not measured in dollars, J. Land Resources & Envtl. L., 25, 139
  3. Brewster, 2004, New release [the whales, they give themselves: conversations with Harry Brower, Sr.], Br. Columbia Hist., 37, 36
  4. Camerino, 1978, Bowhead Update, Am. Indian J., 4, 33
  5. Case, 2006, Tribes and self-determination in Alaska, Hum Rts, 33, 13
  6. Chiropolos, 1994, Inupiat subsistence and the bowhead whale: can Indigenous hunting cultures coexist with endangered animal species, Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y, 5, 213
  7. George, 2007, vol. 11
  8. Harris, 2003, Making the case for collective rights: Indigenous claims to stocks of marine living resources, Georgetown Int. Environ. Law Rev., 15, 379
  9. Jones, 2019, When environmentalists crossed the strait: subsistence whalers, Hippies, and the soviets, RCC Perspect, 81
  10. Khakhovskaya, 2011, The Soviet modernization of deer Breeding in remote northern regions (the case of the anadyr region of Chukotka), Etnogr. Obozr., 112
  11. Kolomiets, 2019, On the history of development of the sea mammal hunt in Chukotka, Bull. Omsk Univ., History Series, 3, 223
  12. Lefevre, 2013, A pioneering effort in the design of process and law supporting integrated Arctic ocean management, Environ. Law Report. News Anal., 43, 10893
  13. Mason, 1977, The bowhead whale controversy: background and aftermath of Adams v. Vance current developments. Harv, Environ. Law Rev., 2, 363
  14. McNeill, 2001, Victims of the ice curtain: siberian Yupiks of the Bering sea, Native Am., 18, 31
  15. Noongwook, 2007, Traditional knowledge of the bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) around St. Lawrence Island, Alaska, Arctic, 60, 47
  16. Nystrom, 2013, vol. 37, 1431
  17. Schiffman, 2003, The international whaling commission: challenges from within and without interntational whaling commission: present challenges and future prospects, ILSA J. Int. Comp. Law, 10, 367

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
  • University of Northern Iowa (US)
  • Inuit Circumpolar Council (CA)
Corresponding author
York, Abigail M.
Venue
Earth System Governance
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
14
Pages
100154
ISSN
2589-8116 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4303650287
Cited by
5
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Earth System Governance (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
Keywords
ocean governance, Indigenous sovereignty, Indigenous self-determination, Arctic whaling, International Whaling Commission, multi-level governance, co-management, Chukchi, Inupiat, right to subsistence, power imbalance, indigenous knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review