CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18Engineering Education and Global ImpactEngineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentEngineering Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Crossing Knowledge Boundaries and Thresholds: Challenging the Dominant Discourse Within Engineering Education

Baillie, Caroline, Armstrong, Rita·2013·Philosophy of Engineering and Technology
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Armstrong, R., & Baillie, C. (2012). Engineers engaging with community: Negotiating cultural difference on mine sites. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice and Peace, 1(1), 7–17. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baillie, C. (2002). Negotiating scientific knowledge. In W. Lepenies (Ed.), Entangled histories and negotiated universals: Centers and peripheries in a changing world (pp. 32–57). Berlin: Campus.
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brueckner, M., & Ross, D. (2010). Under corporate skies: A struggle between people, place and profit. Fremantle: Fremantle Arts Press.
  6. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Routledge Farmer.
  7. Comaroff, J. (2010). The end of anthropology, again: On the future of an in/discipline. American Anthropologist, 112(4), 524–538. · DOI
  8. Djohari, N. (2011). ‘Breaking Other People’s Toys’: Reflections on teaching critical anthropology in development studies. Teaching Anthropology, 1(1), 21–29. · DOI
  9. Downey, G. (1998). The machine in me: An anthropologist sits amongst computer engineers. New York: Routledge.
  10. Downey, G., & Lucena, J. (2007). Engineering selves: Hiring in to a contested field of education. In G. Downey & J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborgs & citadels (pp. 117–141). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
  11. Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.
  13. Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams. New York: Palgrave. · DOI
  14. Holton, R. (1997). Bourdieu and common sense. SubStance, 26(3/84), 38–52. · DOI
  15. hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
  16. Ingold, T. (1994). Introduction to culture. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Companion encyclopedia of anthropology (pp. 329–349). London: Routledge.
  17. Kabo, J., & Baillie, C. (2010). Engineering and social justice: Negotiating the spectrum of liminality. In R. Land, E. Meyer, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 303–315). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  18. Kabo, J., & Baillie, C. (forthcoming 2012). Don’t fear the engineer: Social science students exploring a liminal space with engineering students. In Proceedings Threshold Concepts conference, Dublin, June 2012.
  19. Lambert, R. (2004). Death of a factory: Market rationalism’s hidden abode in inner city Melbourne. Anthropological Forum, 4(3), 297–313. · DOI
  20. Macintyre, M. (2001). Taking care of culture: Anthropology, consultancy and gender issues. Social Analysis, 45(2), 108–119.
  21. Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 373–388. · DOI
  22. Meyer, J., Land, R., & Baillie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  23. Minnegal, M. (2005). Who is talking? Who is listening? Reflections on potential dialogues between anthropologists, scientists and managers. In M. Minnegal (Ed.), Sustainable environments, sustainable communities: Potential dialogues between anthropologists, scientists and managers (pp. 1–9). Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
  24. Parkinson, D. (2011). Investigation of experiences of threshold concepts by engineering students. Final Year Project Thesis, University of Western Australia.
  25. Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6–11.
  26. Riley, D. (2008). Engineering and social justice. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool Press. · DOI
  27. Wallerstein, I. (2003). Anthropology, sociology and other dubious disciplines. Current Anthropology, 44(4), 453–465. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baillie, C., & Armstrong, R.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Baillie, Caroline
ORCID
Baillie, Caroline
Venue
Philosophy of Engineering and Technology
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published
2013
Pages
135-152
ISSN
  • 1879-7202 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-7210
DOI
10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_7
OpenAlex
W4571703
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.37
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophy of engineering and technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Engineering Education and Global Impact
  • Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
threshold concepts, engineering education, knowledge boundaries, engineering ontology, interdisciplinary knowledge, social inequality, indigenous knowledge, engineering curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review