The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design for the Value of Trust
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, unless a technological arrangement is controlled by a third-party operator-which will thus need to be trusted by the trustor-analysing the trustworthiness of a technology ultimately amounts to assessing the predictability and reliability thereof [41].”
From Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“Yet, the reality is that these networks are hybrid systems made up of both technical and social components [41].”
From Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“In the context of a blockchain-based system, to the extent that there are people at the extremities of the system, trust can never be completely eliminated, it is partially displaced to the developers and maintainers of the network [41].”
From Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6637 · Cited by 16,594
Gamst, F. C. (1991) · Anthropology of Work Review · doi:10.1525/awr.1991.12.3.19 · Cited by 7,932
Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review
Reed, M. S. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 · Cited by 4,237
Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations
Gambetta, D. (1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3664 · Cited by 4,042
The Moral Foundations of Trust
Uslaner, E. M. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614934 · Cited by 2,893
Baier, A. (1986) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/292745 · Cited by 2,567
(2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-84628-301-9_1 · Cited by 2,209
The Moral Foundations of Trust
Uslaner, E. M. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.824504 · Cited by 2,042
Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay' s reputation system
Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004) · Advances in applied microeconomics · doi:10.1016/s0278-0984(02)11030-3 · Cited by 1,831
Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design
Akao, Y. (1990) · Cited by 1,680
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Franck KA, Von Sommaruga Howard T (2010) Design through dialogue: a guide for architects and clients. Wiley, Chichester
- Hardin R (2006) Trust. Polity, New York
- King B (1989) Better design in half the time: implementing QFD in America, 3rd Ed. GOAL/QPC, Methuen
Cited by
Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance
De Filippi, P., Mannan, M., & Reijers, W. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Nickel, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Nickel, Philip J.
- ORCID
- Nickel, Philip J.
- Venue
- Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2015
- Pages
- 551-567
- OpenAlex
- W17217136
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- trust, design for values, interpersonal trust, digital information, information scarcity, social cues, perceptual cues, information and communication technologies, philosophy of trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design for the Value of Trust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0_21
- The paper
- Nickel, P. J. (2015). Design for the Value of Trust. Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0_21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
