Trust and Antitrust
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Trust necessarily comes with some degree of risk, uncertainty, or unpredictability because the trustee can act against the interests of the trustor.
“However, the flipside of trust is that it necessarily comes with some degree of risk and uncertainty, or unpredictability [27]; p. 208) insofar as the trustee has the ability to act against the interests of the trustor 6 -which is especially true in the case of information and power asymmetries [28].”
From Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635 · see citing works
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346 · see citing works
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550 · see citing works
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676 · see citing works
What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology
McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2001.11044235 · Cited by 2,282 · see citing works
On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model
Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00041-7 · Cited by 1,200 · see citing works
Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics
Manson, N. C., & O'Neill, O. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814600 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Transparency and the black box problem: why we do not trust AI
von Eschenbach, W. J. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Trust and Distrust Definitions: One Bite at a Time
Harrison McKnight, D., & Chervany, N. L. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45547-7_3 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
Measuring Patients’ Trust in their Primary Care Providers
Hall, M. A., Zheng, B., Dugan, E., Camacho, F., Kidd, K. E., Mishra, A., & Balkrishnan, R. (2002) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558702059003004 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global
Held, V. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0195180992.001.0001 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability
Ryan, M. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00228-y · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI
Jacovi, A., Marasović, A., Miller, T., & Goldberg, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445923 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance
De Filippi, P., Mannan, M., & Reijers, W. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Jones, K. (2012) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/667838 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Sobel, D. M., & Kushnir, T. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0034191 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Trust, Democracy and Governance: Can Government Policies Influence Generalized Trust?
Uslaner, E. M. (2003) · Generating Social Capital · doi:10.1057/9781403979544_9 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents
van Wynsberghe, A., & Robbins, S. (2019) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0030-8 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Wischnewski, M., Krämer, N., & Müller, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581197 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
In community we trust: Online security communication at eBay
Boyd, J. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00147.x · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Chica, M., Chiong, R., Kirley, M., & Ishibuchi, H. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2017.2769081 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
You Complete Me: Human-AI Teams and Complementary Expertise
Zhang, Q., Lee, M. L., & Carter, S. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517791 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Belfrage, S., Helgesson, G., & Lynøe, N. (2022) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-022-00758-z · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Expert responsibility in AI development
Hedlund, M., & Persson, E. (2024) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01498-9 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Raees, M., Khan, V.-J., Lykourentzou, I., & Papangelis, K. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791467 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baier, A.
- Corresponding author
- Baier, Annette
- Venue
- Ethics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231-260
- ISSN
- 0014-1704 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2058583438
- Cited by
- 2,567
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 194 · 2025: 192 · 2024: 152 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 153 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 117 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 82
- FWCI
- 21.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ethics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Legal and Constitutional Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Keywords
- trust, competition law, competition policy, market trust, business ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review