The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading
Open accessAbstract
It has long been recognized that it is difficult for an innovating firm to fully appropriate the benefits arising from its innovations, and that desired research might therefore not be performed (Nelson 1959, pp. 297–306). One sometimes possible solution to this dilemma is cooperative R&D conducted by firms who share the costs and benefits of particular R&D projects (Johnson 1973).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445 · Cited by 3,864
A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey
Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505 · Cited by 2,315
Tsai, W. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536 · Cited by 1,905
Storper, M. (1995) · European Urban and Regional Studies · doi:10.1177/096977649500200301 · Cited by 1,595
Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey
Breschi, S. (2001) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.975 · Cited by 1,536
Metadata
- Authors
- von Hippel, E.
- Venue
- Studies in Industrial Organization
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1989
- Pages
- 157-175
- ISSN
- 0924-4646 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121043799
- Cited by
- 798
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.05
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-009-1075-1_7
- The paper
- von Hippel, E. (1989). Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading. Studies in Industrial Organization. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1075-1_7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
