Cited by 19Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyAgricultural safety and regulationsEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

The dimensions of space and time in the assessment of ecotoxicological risks

Jepson, Paul C., Sherratt, Tom N.·1996·ECOtoxicology: Ecological Dimensions

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-009-1541-1_5

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jepson, P. C., & Sherratt, T. N.
Venue
ECOtoxicology: Ecological Dimensions
Published
1996
Pages
43-54
OpenAlex
W68022534
Cited by
19
References
17
Citations by year
2022: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
ecotoxicological risk assessment, environmental risk assessment, chemical contaminants, probabilistic risk assessment, population effects, ecological theory, risk assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review