The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Credibility and trust in risk communication
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 48,949
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,122
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,517
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,445
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Cited by
Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation
Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2003) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00373 · Cited by 721
The Role of Public Trust During Pandemics: Implications for Crisis Communication
Siegrist, M., & Zingg, A. (2014) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000169 · Cited by 420
Test of a Trust and Confidence Model in the Applied Context of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Risks
Siegrist, M., Earle, T. C., & Gutscher, H. (2003) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00349 · Cited by 366
The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception
Whitfield, S. C., Rosa, E. A., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2009) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01155.x · Cited by 314
Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W., & Simmons, P. (2008) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662506066719 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Renn, O., & Levine, D.
- Venue
- Communicating Risks to the Public
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1991
- Pages
- 175-217
- OpenAlex
- W1876294113
- Cited by
- 717
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 54.17
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Credibility and trust in risk communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10
- The paper
- Renn, O., & Levine, D. (1991). Credibility and trust in risk communication. Communicating Risks to the Public. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
