Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mental short-cuts allow individuals to come to decisions quickly while suppressing any urge to think about the next action.
“Mental short-cuts allow individuals to come to decisions quickly while suppressing any urge to think about the next action (Cognitive Heuristics; Tversky and Kahneman, 1975).”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Tversky and Kahneman, 1975
Heuristics can lead to biases because something that has been applicable in the past is not necessarily suitable in another situation.
“But heuristics can lead to biases as something that has been applicable in the past, is not necessarily suitable in another situation.”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Tversky and Kahneman, 1975
Rule-of-thumb strategies play an important role in decision making.
“Rule-of-thumb strategies play an important role in decision”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Tversky and Kahneman, 1975
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 22,650
- Authors
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Venue
- Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1975
- Volume
- 185
- Issue
- 4157
- Pages
- 141-162
- OpenAlex
- W158727920
- Cited by
- 22,650
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 153 · 2023: 195 · 2022: 288 · 2021: 804 · 2020: 977 · 2019: 978 · 2018: 957 · 2017: 946 · 2016: 1034 · 2015: 1217 · 2014: 1285 · 2013: 1191 · 2012: 1164
- FWCI
- 38.75
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
- Keywords
- judgment under uncertainty, heuristics, cognitive biases, representativeness heuristic, availability heuristic, anchoring effect, probability judgment, frequency judgment, decision-making, systematic errors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
