The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individualism and Psychology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marr, D., & Hildreth, E. (1980) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0020 · Cited by 6,510
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Cited by
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7 · Cited by 6,333
Loops, constitution, and cognitive extension
Orestis Palermos, S. (2014) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.04.002 · Cited by 155
Inference to the hypothesis of extended cognition
Sprevak, M. (2010) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.10.010 · Cited by 62
Beyond modularity: Neural evidence for constructivist principles in development
Quartz, S. R., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00036839 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Burge, T.
- Venue
- Rerepresentation
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1989
- Pages
- 39-75
- OpenAlex
- W1548498140
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.12
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individualism and Psychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-009-2649-3_3
- The paper
- Burge, T. (1989). Individualism and Psychology. Rerepresentation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2649-3_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
