Loops, constitution, and cognitive extension
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reciprocal causal coupling on its own is not enough for cognitive systemhood.
“But reciprocal causal coupling on its own is still not enough according to the CSA pace some theorists such as Palermos (2014).”
From Traces of thinking: a stigmergic approach to 4E cognition (2025) · cites this paper as Palermos (2014)
Cites
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7 · Cited by 5,457 · cited 10× · see citing works
“As a general approach to the nature of mind, active externalism (Clark and Chalmers 1998; Rowlands 1999; Wilson 2000; Wilson 2004; Menary 2007) is standardly contrasted with Putnam (1975) and Burge’s (1986) meaning, or passive, externalism as it concentrates on the aspects of the environment that…”
InfluentialBeyond sensory substitution—learning the sixth sense
Nagel, S. K., Carl, C., Kringe, T., Märtin, R., & König, P. (2005) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/2/4/r02 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dimensions of integration in embedded and extended cognitive systems
Heersmink, R. (2015) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-014-9355-1 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Externalized memory in slime mould and the extended (non-neuronal) mind
Sims, M., & Kiverstein, J. (2022) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.12.001 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
ChatGPT, extended: large language models and the extended mind
Smart, P., Clowes, R., & Clark, A. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05046-y · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Traces of thinking: a stigmergic approach to 4E cognition
Sims, R. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05074-8 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The CSA analysis is sketched in the broadest outline, and it is taken for granted that there are omissions and the need for refinement.”
- Authors
- Orestis Palermos, S.
- Venue
- Cognitive Systems Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 25-41
- ISSN
- 1389-0417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007549063
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Cognitive Systems Research (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/J011908/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- extended cognition, embedded cognition, dynamical systems theory, nonlinear relationship, shopping lists, directory services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
