The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integrating Scientific Disciplines
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo
Amundson, R. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164856 · Cited by 584
Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ.
Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.888 · Cited by 397
Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research
Nissani, M. (1997) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/s0362-3319(97)90051-3 · Cited by 358
Developmental Dynamics: Toward a Biologically Plausible Evolutionary Psychology.
Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.819 · Cited by 323
Assessing Cardiac Metabolism: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Taegtmeyer, H., Young, M. E., Lopaschuk, G. D., Abel, E. D., Brunengraber, H., Darley-Usmar, V., Des Rosiers, C., Gerszten, R., Glatz, J. F., Griffin, J. L., et al. (2016) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/res.0000000000000097 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Venue
- Science and Philosophy
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1986
- ISSN
- 0924-4697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W609115103
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 53.47
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating Scientific Disciplines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-010-9435-1
- The paper
- Integrating Scientific Disciplines. (1986). Science and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9435-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
