Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ.

Reber, Arthur S., Walkenfeld, Faye F., Hernstadt, Ruth·1991·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

We explored the degree to which individual differences in performance were observed in a group of subjects who worked with two different tasks: one implicit and one explicit. The implicit task was a standard artificial grammar-learning task; the explicit was a series-completion problem-solving task. Substantial individual differences were found between subjects on the explicit task; relatively small individual differences were found on the implicit task. Moreover, performance on the explicit task correlated strongly with intelligence quotient, but performance on the implicit task did not. Data from previous experiments were also found to be in agreement with these results. The findings are presented in the context of a general theory of implicit learning proposed recently by Reber (1989a, in press) that derives from considerations of the evolution of cognitive processes. This evolutionary model argues that unconscious, implicit induction systems are evolutionarily older and antedate conscious, explicit learning processes, and that this antiquity carries with it particular patterns of function that differentiate implicit processes from explicit processes.

Cites (40)

  1. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences
    Klitgaard, Robert, Gardner, Howard · 1984 · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
  2. "General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured
    Spearman, C. · 1904 · The American Journal of Psychology
  3. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
    Lyle E. Bourne · 1977
  4. Handbook of neuropsychology
    Berti, Anna · 1992 · Neuropsychologia
  5. Implicit memory: History and current status.
    Schacter, Daniel L. · 1987 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
  6. Automatic and effortful processes in memory.
    Hasher, Lynn, Zacks, Rose T. · 1979 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  7. Memory and cognition
    Walter Kintsch · 1977 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
  8. Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge
    Reber, Arthur S. · 2003 · Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness
  9. Further analysis of the hippocampal amnesic syndrome: 14-year follow-up study of H.M.
    Milner, Brenda, Corkin, Suzanne, Teuber, H.-L. · 1968 · Neuropsychologia
  10. Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence.
    Lynn Hasher, Rose T. Zacks · 1984 · American Psychologist

Show all 40 references

Cited by (25)

  1. Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision Making
    Dane, Erik, Pratt, Michael G. · 2007 · Academy of Management Review
  2. Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems
    Shanks, David R., St. John, Mark F. · 1994 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  3. MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric Study
    Ellis, Rod · 2005 · Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  4. A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory
    Schnotz, Wolfgang, Kürschner, Christian · 2007 · Educational Psychology Review
  5. Attention, Memory, and the “Noticing” Hypothesis
    Robinson, Peter · 1995 · Language Learning

See all 397

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.888
The paper
Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.888

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.