Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ.
Abstract
We explored the degree to which individual differences in performance were observed in a group of subjects who worked with two different tasks: one implicit and one explicit. The implicit task was a standard artificial grammar-learning task; the explicit was a series-completion problem-solving task. Substantial individual differences were found between subjects on the explicit task; relatively small individual differences were found on the implicit task. Moreover, performance on the explicit task correlated strongly with intelligence quotient, but performance on the implicit task did not. Data from previous experiments were also found to be in agreement with these results. The findings are presented in the context of a general theory of implicit learning proposed recently by Reber (1989a, in press) that derives from considerations of the evolution of cognitive processes. This evolutionary model argues that unconscious, implicit induction systems are evolutionarily older and antedate conscious, explicit learning processes, and that this antiquity carries with it particular patterns of function that differentiate implicit processes from explicit processes.
Cites (40)
- Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple IntelligencesKlitgaard, Robert, Gardner, Howard · 1984 · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
- "General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and MeasuredSpearman, C. · 1904 · The American Journal of Psychology
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and MemoryLyle E. Bourne · 1977
- Handbook of neuropsychologyBerti, Anna · 1992 · Neuropsychologia
- Implicit memory: History and current status.Schacter, Daniel L. · 1987 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Hasher, Lynn, Zacks, Rose T. · 1979 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Memory and cognitionWalter Kintsch · 1977 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
- Implicit Learning and Tacit KnowledgeReber, Arthur S. · 2003 · Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness
- Further analysis of the hippocampal amnesic syndrome: 14-year follow-up study of H.M.Milner, Brenda, Corkin, Suzanne, Teuber, H.-L. · 1968 · Neuropsychologia
- Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence.Lynn Hasher, Rose T. Zacks · 1984 · American Psychologist
Cited by (25)
- Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision MakingDane, Erik, Pratt, Michael G. · 2007 · Academy of Management Review
- Characteristics of dissociable human learning systemsShanks, David R., St. John, Mark F. · 1994 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric StudyEllis, Rod · 2005 · Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load TheorySchnotz, Wolfgang, Kürschner, Christian · 2007 · Educational Psychology Review
- Attention, Memory, and the “Noticing” HypothesisRobinson, Peter · 1995 · Language Learning
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.888
- The paper
- Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.888
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.