Cited by 58Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Pilot-Wave Theory of Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Valentini, Antony·1996·Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-015-8715-0_3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In general pilot-wave theory describes a 'nonequilibrium' state that violates the Born rule.

    “in general describes a 'nonequilibrium' state that violates the Born rule”

    From De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial? (2008) · cites this paper as Valentini 1996

  • It has been argued at length that taking the quantum equilibrium distribution as an axiom is incorrect and deeply misleading.

    “It has been argued at length that this is incorrect and deeply misleading”

    From De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial? (2008) · cites this paper as Valentini 1996

  • For an ensemble with a 'quantum nonequilibrium' distribution, in general one obtains a distribution of final outcomes that disagrees with quantum theory (for as long as P has not yet relaxed to |Ψ|^2).

    “in general one obtains a distribution of final outcomes that disagrees with quantum theory”

    From De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial? (2008) · cites this paper as Valentini 1996

  • This terminology is misleading, because such procedures are - at least according to pilot-wave theory - generally not correct measurements: they are merely experiments of a certain kind, designed to respect a formal analogy with classical measurements.

    “This terminology is misleading, because such procedures are - at least according to pilot-wave theory - generally not correct measurements: they are merely experiments of a certain kind, designed to respect a formal analogy with classical measurements”

    From De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial? (2008) · cites this paper as Valentini 1996

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valentini, A.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Valentini, Antony
Venue
Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
Published
1996
Pages
45-66
ISSN
0068-0346 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1560785376
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.13
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Boston studies in the philosophy of science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
Bohmian mechanics, hidden variables, nonlocality, Bell's theorem, quantum statistics, uncertainty principle, gravity, cosmology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review