The Evolution of Sharedplans
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Effective group work requires an accurate mental model of one's teammates-humans or AI.
“The idea that efective group work requires an accurate mental model of one's teammates-humans or AI-goes back decades [7,16].”
From Assessing the Impact of Automated Suggestions on Decision Making: Domain Experts Mediate Model Errors but Take Less Initiative (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Cites
Shoham, Y. (1992) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(93)90034-9 · Cited by 2,658 · see citing works
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.
Velleman, J. D., & Bratman, M. E. (1991) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185304 · Cited by 2,383 · see citing works
Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action
Grosz, B., & Kraus, S. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(95)00103-4 · Cited by 1,267 · see citing works
Self-citationProceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017)
Amendola, G., Ricca, F., & Truszczyński, M. (2017) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Plans and resource‐bounded practical reasoning
Bratman, M. E., Israel, D. J., & Pollack, M. E. (1988) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1988.tb00284.x · Cited by 1,137 · see citing works
Bratman, M. (1991) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185537 · Cited by 998 · see citing works
Gibbs, R. W., Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J. L., & Pollack, M. E. (1991) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422946 · Cited by 967 · see citing works
(1990) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3839.001.0001 · Cited by 901 · see citing works
Controlling cooperative problem solving in industrial multi-agent systems using joint intentions
Jennings, N. R. (1995) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00020-2 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1990) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3839.003.0022 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Self-citationDean, T., & Wellman, M. P. (1991) · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Levesque, H. J., Cohen, P. R., & Nunes, J. H. T. (1990) · National Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Russell, S., & Wefald, E. H. (1991) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(91)90015-c · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Optimal composition of real-time systems
Shlomo Zilberstein, B., & Russell, S. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00074-3 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Bundy, A., Giunchiglia, F., Sebastiani, R., & Walsh, T. (1996) · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Collaborative Systems (AAAI-94 Presidential Address)
Grosz, B. J. (1996) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v17i2.1223 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationCollaborative plans for group activities
Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S. (1993) · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationModels of plans to support communication: an initial report
Lochbaum, K. E., Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1990) · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing Collaborative Plans to Model the Intentional Structure of Discourse
Lochbaum, K. E. (1994) · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Reasoning about actions and plans
Georgeff, M., & Lanksy, A. (1986) · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Reasoning About Actions and Plans
Tate, A. (1986) · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The Use of Knowledge Preconditions in Language ProcessingPreprint
Lochbaum, K. E. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cmp-lg/9508011 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Representing Plans Under Uncertainty: A Logic of Time, Chance, and Action
Haddawy, P., Carbonell, J., & Siekmann, J. (1994) · Cited by 33 · see citing works
The One-Day Student Conference
Haughey, F. (1997) · Archaeology International · doi:10.5334/ai.0116 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms
Horling, B., & Lesser, V. (2004) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888905000317 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
“…based on the joint intentions framework ( Levesque et al ., 1990), which formally defines how agents should reason over joint commitments and shared goals , and SharedPlans theory ( Grosz & Kraus , 1999), which provides a formal way to encode and reason about joint plans , intentions and beliefs .”
BackgroundMethodReaching Agreements Through Argumentation: A Logical Model and Implementation
Kraus, S., Sycara, K., & Evenchik, A. (1998) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00078-2 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
Self-citationBeyond Accuracy: The Role of Mental Models in Human-AI Team Performance
Bansal, G., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Lasecki, W. S., Weld, D. S., & Horvitz, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v7i1.5285 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
“Early work explored the importance of mental models for achieving high performance in group work (Grosz and Kraus 1999; Mohammed, Ferzandi, and Hamilton 2010), human-system collaboration (Rouse, Cannon-Bowers, and Salas 1992), and interface design (Carroll and Olson 1988).”
BackgroundHealth dialog systems for patients and consumers
Bickmore, T., & Giorgino, T. (2006) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.004 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
“As an example of a plan-based computational model of discourse, we briefly review the theory developed by Grosz and Sidner [11], later elaborated by Grosz and Kraus and Lochbaum [40,41], and implemented in the COLLAGEN dialog engine [42].”
MethodProperties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
Parsons, S. (2003) · Journal of Logic and Computation · doi:10.1093/logcom/13.3.347 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
“As a result of this requirement, there has been much work on providing agents with the ability to hold such dialogues — for example by Dignum and colleagues [8, 9], Grosz and Kraus [15], Parsons and Jennings [28, 30], Reed [37], Schroeder et al. [40], and Sycara [42].”
BackgroundInfluentialThe eightfold way of deliberation dialogue
McBurney, P., Hitchcock, D. L., & Parsons, S. (2006) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.20191 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“Similarly, theSharedPlans framework of Barbara Grosz and Sarit Kraus [23], for collabo rative planning between agents, assumes that agents begin their interactio n with a partial plan; this framework does not fully specify the mechanisms by which thi s partial plan is transformed into a full plan.”
MethodAutomated Negotiation and Decision Making in Multiagent Environments
Kraus, S. (2001) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-47745-4_7 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
“Others are among the “intend-that” category [8,19,20,106].”
Self-citationAgents with shared mental models for enhancing team decision makings
Yen, J., Fan, X., Sun, S., Hanratty, T., & Dumer, J. C. (2004) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2004.06.008 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
“Grosz and Kraus [15] [16] formalized the concepts of individual plans and shared plans, and explored how a shared plan for a team action evolves from partial (possibly with partial recipe) to a final complete form with complete recipes for the team action and all the subsidiary actions at different…”
BackgroundSpeech Acts for Dialogue Agents
Traum, D. (1999) · Applied logic series · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9204-8_8 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues
Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., & Leila Amgoud, A. (2002) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.1145/544741.544835 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“We are currently investigating these matters along with further dialogue types, more complex kinds of the dialogue types studied here, such planning dialogues [7], and additional complexity issues (including the e ect of languages other than propositional logic).”
BackgroundGrosz, B. J., Hunsberger, L., & Kraus, S. (1999) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · doi:10.1609/aimag.v20i4.1476 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“We subsequently generalized the formalization to accommodate more than two participating agents and to support the construction of teams of collaboration-capable agents (Grosz and Kraus 1999, 1996; Hunsberger 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationDistributed constraint optimization for teams of mobile sensing agents
Zivan, R., Yedidsion, H., Okamoto, S., Glinton, R., & Sycara, K. P. (2014) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-014-9255-3 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“Although the sub-goals of the two sub-teams are different and require different algorithms, awareness of the global goal and the subtask of the other sub-team can enable agents to contribute to the effort of agents in the other sub-team [15,16,38].”
Cooperation, dialogue and ethics
Allwood, J. S., Traum, D. R., & Jokinen, K. (2000) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2000.0425 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Modeling and simulating human teamwork behaviors using intelligent agents
Fan, X., & Yen, J. (2004) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2004.10.001 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“Theoretically, helping behavior can be derived within both the Joint Intentions theory [7] and the SharedPlans formalism [50], [51].”
MethodLevy, A., Agrawal, M., Satyanarayan, A., & Sontag, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445522 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“The idea that effective group work requires an accurate mental model of one’s teammates—humans or AI—goes back decades [7, 16].”
BackgroundOn the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues
Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., & Leila Amgoud, A. (2003) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.1145/860575.860674 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“We are currently investigating these matters along with further dialogue types, such as planning dialogues [9].”
BackgroundTeamwork with Limited Knowledge of Teammates
Barrett, S., Stone, P., Kraus, S., & Rosenfeld, A. (2013) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v27i1.8659 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“The SharedPlans framework assumes common recipes exist across teammates (Grosz and Kraus 1999).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSocially conscious decision-making
Glass, A., & Grosz, B. J. (2000) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.1145/336595.337385 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationThe dynamics of intention in collaborative activity
Grosz, B. J., & Hunsberger, L. (2006) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.11.006 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“The next section of the paper briefly describes the SharedPlans formalization of collaborative activity [16, 17].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationHuman modeling for human–robot collaboration
Hiatt, L. M., Narber, C., Bekele, E., Khemlani, S., & Trafton, J. G. (2017) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364917690592 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“Teamwork is best achieved when members of the team understand one another (Grosz and Kraus, 1999).”
BackgroundSHARY: A Supervision System Adapted to Human-Robot Interaction
Clodic, A., Cao, H., Alili, S., Montreuil, V., Alami, R., & Chatila, R. (2009) · Springer tracts in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00196-3_27 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“Non atomic tasks (see figure 5) can be decomposed into sub-tasks allowing to build a task hierarchy like in SharedPlans[22, 21] or in SHOP [28].”
A theoretical framework on proactive information exchange in agent teamwork
Fan, X., Yen, J., & Volz, R. A. (2005) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2005.06.005 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“However, SPT still lacks an adequate semantics for the “potential intention” operators and the “intentional context” terms [42] (but see Fan and Yen’s recent attempt [37] for the semantics of potential intentions).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA writer's collaborative assistant
Babaian, T., Grosz, B. J., & Shieber, S. M. (2002) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/502716.502722 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationPlanning human centered robot activities
Montreuil, V., Clodic, A., Ransan, M., & Alami, R. (2007) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2007.4413992 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“This approach uses the ”recipes” of the SharedPlans formalism [9], [10] to produce a hierarchical structure showing intentions of agents involved in the dialogue allowing, thus, to produce adapted segments of discourse.”
MethodArgumentation-Based Dialogues for Agent Co-Ordination
Parsons, S., & McBurney, P. (2003) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1023/b:grup.0000003742.50038.d3 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“It is increasingly being applied to the design of agent communications languages and frameworks, for example: Dignum and colleagues [12, 13]; Grosz and Kraus [20]; Parsons and Jennings [36, 37]; Reed [45]; Schroeder et al.”
MethodA Real-Time Negotiation Model and A Multi-Agent Sensor Network Implementation
Soh, L.-K., & Tsatsoulis, C. (2005) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-005-0539-5 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“Kraus and Wilkenfeld [26] proposed a negotiation model on hostage crisis.”
MethodInfluentialA Survey of Ad Hoc Teamwork Research
Mirsky, R., Carlucho, I., Rahman, A., Fosong, E., Macke, W., Sridharan, M., Stone, P., & Albrecht, S. V. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20614-6_16 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Interactive Execution Monitoring of Agent Teams
Wilkins, D. E., Lee, T. J., & Berry, P. M. (2003) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1112 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Distributed Constraint Optimization for Large Teams of Mobile Sensing Agents
Zivan, R., Glinton, R., & Sycara, K. P. (2009) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) · doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2009.176 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Intention reconciliation by collaborative agents
Sullivan, D. G., Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S. (2002) · International Conference on Multi Agent Systems · doi:10.1109/icmas.2000.858466 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“Research on collaboration in multi-agent systems [6, 7 , 13, 15, 22] has established that commitment to the joint activity is a defining characteristic of collaboration.”
BackgroundSelf-citationA Tuning Machine for Cooperative Problem Solving
Dunin‐Kȩplicz, B., & Verbrugge, R. (2004) · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Do You Read Me? Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Chat Communities
Dickey, M. H., Burnett, G., Chudoba, K. M., & Kazmer, M. M. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00113 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Monitoring deployed agent teams
Kaminka, G. A., Pynadath, D. V., & Tambe, M. (2001) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.1145/375735.376316 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Argumentation-Based Communication between Agents
Parsons, S., & McBurney, P. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-44972-0_8 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“... provoke already attached—“It is raining outside, I got soaked through”, “The editorial in today’s Guardian suggests that consumer confidence in the US is so low that the Dow Jones index will continue falling for the next six months.” This is exactly argumentation-basedcommunication.It is increasingly being applied…”
BackgroundPlan recognition for interface agents
Armentano, M. G., & Amandi, A. (2007) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-009-9095-8 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“collagen (Rich and Sidner 1997, 1998; Lesh and Rich 1999; Rich et al. 2001 )i s an intelligent user interface system that models human–computer interaction based on the concepts of SharedPlan ( Grosz and Kraus 1996, 1999 ).”
MethodGroup decision making and temporal reasoning
Grosz, B. J., & Hunsberger, L. (2002) · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationLeading a Best-Response Teammate in an Ad Hoc Team
Stone, P., Kaminka, G. A., & Rosenschein, J. S. (2010) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15117-0_10 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Stigmergic Collaboration: A Framework for Understanding and Designing Mass Collaboration
Elliott, M. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_4 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Argumentation-based dialogues for deliberation
Tang, Y., & Parsons, S. (2005) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.1145/1082473.1082557 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Alterman, R., & Garland, A. (2001) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2504_4 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Teaching and leading an ad hoc teammate: Collaboration without pre-coordination
Stone, P., Kaminka, G. A., Kraus, S., Rosenschein, J. S., & Agmon, N. (2013) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2013.07.003 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“The SharedPlans framework [46, 7, 47] summarizes the set of beliefs and intentions needed for collaborative activity, and provides the rationale for the process of revising beliefs and intentions.”
BackgroundSelf-citationCommunicating with unknown teammates
Barrett, S., Agmon, N., Hazon, N., Kraus, S., & Stone, P. (2014) · doi:10.5555/2615731.2617509 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationSmart Enough to Talk With Us? Foundations and Challenges for Dialogue Capable AI Systems
Grosz, B. J. (2018) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00313 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“Kraus and I subsequently generalized this initial model to one able to handle an arbitrary number of agents and more complex recipes for actions (Grosz and Kraus 1996, 1999).”
BackgroundSelf-citationTowards an AI Coach to Infer Team Mental Model Alignment in Healthcare
Seo, S., Kennedy-Metz, L. R., Zenati, M. A., Shah, J., DIAS, R. D., & Unhelkar, V. V. (2021) · IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA) · doi:10.1109/cogsima51574.2021.9475925 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Motivated by the variety of teaming contexts, research on human teaming, multi-agent systems and human-robot collaboration has led to several formalism to represent teamwork [17]–[19].”
BackgroundMulti-agent Collaboration for Conflict Management in Residential Demand Response
Golpayegani, F., Dusparić, I., Taylor, A., & Clarke, S. (2016) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2016.04.020 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
A Framework for Dynamic Information Flow in Mixed-Initiative Human/Agent Organizations
Burstein, M. H., & Diller, D. E. (2004) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1023/b:apin.0000021419.19822.a2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Full Shared Plans [9, 10] allow for the case that some step ri in the recipe R to achieve P are to be carried out by a subgroup of the team, and that all team members believe that there is a plan for that subgroup to achieve ri,but they do not know what it is.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe influence of social norms and social consciousness on intention reconciliation
Grosz, B. J., Kraus, S., Sullivan, D. G., & Das, S. (2002) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(02)00274-6 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“This work with SPIRE brings two threads of research together, joining research on collaboration in multiagent systems [15, 16, 24, 27, 42]—which has established that commitment to the joint activity is a defining characteristic of collaboration—with research on rationality and resource-bounded reasoning [8, 12, 21, 30…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Mechanics of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
Parsons, S., McBurney, P., & Wooldridge, M. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24608-4_19 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“We are currently investigating these matters along with further dialogue types, such as planning dialogues [10].”
BackgroundTowards tractable agent-based dialogue
Blaylock, N. J., & Allen, J. F. (2005) · UR Research (University of Rochester) · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A Model for Integrating Dialogue and the Execution of Joint Plans
Tang, Y., Norman, T. J., & Parsons, S. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_4 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Here there is a rich vein of work to draw on, for instance [7, 11], and we will seek to incorporate this into our model.”
Communicating with Unknown Teammates
Barrett, S., Agmon, N., Hazon, N., Kraus, S., & Stone, P. (2014) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-419-0-45 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“The SharedPlans framework assumes common recipes exist across teammates [8].”
BackgroundSelf-citationQuantitative organizational modeling and design for multi-agent systems
Lesser, V., & Horling, B. (2006) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Abdulrahman, A., & Richards, D. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3308532.3329413 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Following SharedPlans [6], the plans component contains a set of plans of two types: sub-plans and full-plans which are called partial-plans and complete-plans, respectively, in the SharedPlans formalization.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIntention Reconciliation in the Context of Teamwork: An Initial Empirical Investigation
Sullivan, D. G., Glass, A., Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S. (1999) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48414-0_10 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationInformation needs in agent teamwork
Yen, J., Fan, X., & Volz, R. A. (2004) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Making SharedPlans More Concise and Easier to Reason About
Hunsberger, L. (1999) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-49057-4_6 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
On agents and grids: Creating the fabric for a new generation of distributed intelligent systems
Gil, Y. (2006) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2006.03.002 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Towards Collaborative Intelligent Tutors: Automated Recognition of Users’ Strategies
Gal, K., Yamangil, E., Shieber, S. M., Rubin, A., & Grosz, B. J. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_21 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Complex actions can be decomposed into sub-actions [7].”
BackgroundSelf-citationGrosz, B. J. (2005) · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationRecognition of Users’ Activities Using Constraint Satisfaction
Reddy, S., Gal, K., & Shieber, S. M. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_46 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Complex actions are achieved indirectly through the completion of other actions, called sub-actions, which are themselves basic or complex actions [11].”
BackgroundGroup planning with time constraints
Hadad, M., Kraus, S., Hartman, I. B., & Rosenfeld, A. (2013) · Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10472-013-9363-9 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“More discussion of the SharedPlan definitions and of the planning processes is given in [Grosz and Kraus 1996; Grosz and Kraus 1999].”
MethodSelf-citationA logic-based model of intention formation and action for multi-agent subcontracting
Grant, J., Kraus, S., & Perlis, D. R. (2004) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2004.11.003 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Intentions in the context of SharedPlans were studied in [19,20], but no semantics were given.”
BackgroundSelf-citationSelf-interested Planning Agents using Plan Repair
Krogt, V. D. R. P. J., & Weerdt, M. M. D. (2005) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Toward an argumentation-based dialogue framework for human-robot collaboration
Azhar, M. Q. (2012) · INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION · doi:10.1145/2388676.2388743 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Introspective and elaborative processes in rational agents
Ortiz, C. L. (1999) · Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1023/a:1018961502002 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Grosz and Kraus emphasize that an intention-that φ is not to be confused with an intention-to achieve(φ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning collaborative team behavior from observation
Johnson, C. L., & González, A. J. (2013) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.029 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Participant Selection for Short-term Collaboration in Open Multi-agent systems
Golpayegani, F., Sahaf, Z., Dusparić, I., & Clarke, S. (2017) · Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory · doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2017.11.007 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Intentional actions, plans, and information systems
Kaza, N., & Hopkins, L. D. (2011) · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.603337 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“The labels for two recent AI projects, SharedPlans (Grosz and Kraus 1999) and Teamwork (Cohen and Levesque 1991), emphasize their focus on collaboration, situations in which two or more actors seek to achieve a common intention.”
Interpreting Information Requests in Context A Collaborative Web Interface for Distance Learning
Ortiz, C. L., & Grosz, B. J. (2002) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1019608411687 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Intentions-that can themselves lead to helpful actions [15, 37].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationCollaborative narrative generation in persistent virtual environments
Madden, N. (2009) · Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Designing Multi-Agent System Organisations for Flexible Runtime Behaviour
Keogh, K., & Sonenberg, L. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10155335 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“SharedPlans [75] are used to achieve coordinated behaviour by agents.”
MethodSocially Conscious Decision-Making
Glass, A., & Grosz, B. J. (2003) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1022987709366 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationAbdulrahman, A., & Richards, D. (2021) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti5090056 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Grosz and Kraus [32] further emphasised the importance of intentions in collaborative planning and introduced the concept of SharedPlans, which refers to the plan constructed by members of a team based on their intentions.”
BackgroundTOWARDS A THEORY FOR MULTIPARTY PROACTIVE COMMUNICATION IN AGENT TEAMS
Kamali, K., Fan, X., & Yen, J. (2007) · International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems · doi:10.1142/s0218843007001640 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Monitoring and Guiding User Attention and Intention in Human-Robot Interaction
Clair, A. S., Mead, R., & Matarić, M. J. (2010) · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Some Preliminary Steps Towards a Meta-theory for Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
Parsons, S., McBurney, P., & Wooldridge, M. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“First, we are deepening the analysis in this paper, extending the work to h andle the notion of “across the course of the dialogue”, and investigating other kinds o f dialogue, such as the deliberation (in the terminology of [23]) dialogues [9].”
MethodOn Proactive Delivery of Needed Information to Teammates
Yen, J., Fan, X., & Volz, R. A. (2002) · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Dynamic intention structures I: a theory of intention representation
Hunsberger, L., & Ortiz, C. L. (2008) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-008-9032-2 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“The SharedPlans formalization [14, 15 ] specifies the mental state (i.e., intentions and beliefs) of a group of collaborating agents.”
BackgroundInfluentialProactive Communications in Agent Teamwork
Yen, J., Fan, X., & Volz, R. A. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24608-4_16 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Grosz and Kraus proposed several axioms for deriving helpful behaviors [2, 3].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAnnotating Cooperative Plans with Trusted Agents
Griffiths, N., Flucke, G., & d’Inverno, M. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-36609-1_8 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“However, we are not concerned with group planning per se, and this paper is orthogonal to work such as Grosz and Kraus' model of SharedPlans [7], and although the notions of trust and motivation are applicable to group planning, this is is beyond the scope of our work.”
MethodThe adversarial activity model for bounded rational agents
Zuckerman, I., Kraus, S., & Rosenschein, J. S. (2010) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-010-9153-2 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Our formal model is based upon Grosz and Kraus’s BDI formalism [24, 25 ] which is a manysorted logic augmented with operators, meta-predicates and action expressions.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationContext-Centric Needs Anticipation Using Information Needs Graphs
Fan, X., Wang, R., Sun, S., Yen, J., & Volz, R. A. (2006) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-006-6931-2 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“and terminating of both joint intentions [11] and shared plans [ 12 ].”
BackgroundWang, H., Cai, G., & MacEachren, A. M. (2008) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai.2008.15 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“The design of the PlanGraph model is mainly based on two important theories, the computational collaborative discourse theory [9] and the SharedPlan theory [10, 11], together with the agent-based computational model, the RecipeGraph (Rgraph) model [12].”
BackgroundMethodTeamwork Coordination in Large-Scale Mobile Agent Networks
Ježić, G., Kušek, M., & Sinković, V. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11892960_29 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“In our approach, agents use a shared plan such as that described in [ 10 ].”
MethodAdaptive Coordination in Distributed and Dynamic Agent Organizations
Keogh, K., & Sonenberg, L. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35545-5_3 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Learning Collaborative Behavior by Observation
Johnson, C. L., & González, A. J. (2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla.2010.22 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“The two most popular teamworking theories are Joint Intention Theory [3] and SharedPlan [4].”
Grosz, B. J. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1070-1_11 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationInterface Devices and Public Participation 1
Hopkins, L. D., Twidale, M. B., & Pallathucheril, V. G. (2008) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Effective agent collaboration through improved communication by means of contextual reasoning
Barrett, G. C., & González, A. J. (2010) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.20458 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Coordination in Adaptive Organisations: Extending Shared Plans with Knowledge Cultivation
Keogh, K., Sonenberg, L., & Smith, W. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02377-4_6 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“The SharedPlans framework [8, 9 ] offers a form of adaptive dynamic team planning needed in DM. Team Situation Awareness and Shared Mental Models of the task and team are not made explicit in SharedPlans, although they are important in enabling adaption in human teams [2].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialArgumentation-Based Multi-agent Dialogues for Deliberation
Tang, Y., & Parsons, S. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11794578_15 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“As [4] points out, there is a large variety of approaches, from distributed versions of classical AI planning techniques like NOAH [3] and partial planning [6], to techniques that were developed to exploit specific attributes of multi-agent systems like joint intentions [14,23], or the intention-that of SharedPlans […”
MethodFormal Approaches to Teamwork.
Grant, J., Kraus, S., & Perlis, D. R. (2005) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationHoracek, H. (2000) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2000.0430 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
DSAAR: A Distributed Software Architecture for Autonomous Robots
Santana, P., Santos, V., & Barata, J. (2006) · IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) · doi:10.1109/etfa.2006.355224 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A Mechanism for Group Decision Making in Collaborative Activity
Hunsberger, L., & Zancanaro, M. (2000) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A stigmergic approach for social interaction design in collaboration engineering
Zamfirescu, C.-B., Cândea, C., & Radu, C. (2014) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2014.04.061 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization
(2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Partsakoulakis, I., & Vouros, G. A. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-7868-4_8 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Speculative Planning With Delegation
Abacı, T., Cı́ger, J., & Thalmann, D. (2004) · International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW) · doi:10.1109/cw.2004.57 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“For example, shared plans [ 11 ] or project COLLAGEN [20] require the agents to know about each other and communicate among themselves in the process of solving the problem.”
BackgroundImportance and Properties of Roles in MAS Organization: A Review of Methodologies and Systems
Partsakoulakis, I., & Vouros, G. (2002) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- Venue
- Applied Logic Series
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 227-262
- ISSN
- 1386-2790 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1596507639
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 17.54
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Applied logic series (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Keywords
- agent cooperation, group planning, plan execution, coordination, shared goals, rational agents, multi-agent systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
