The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Therefore, the locality condition conflicts with quantum mechanics; quantum mechanics is nonlocal.”
From An Elementary Proof That Everett's Quantum Multiverse Is Nonlocal: Bell-Locality and Branch-Symmetry in the Many-Worlds Interpretation (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,001
Reid, M. D. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2765 · Cited by 24
Bell inequalities for three systems and arbitrarily many measurement outcomes
Grandjean, B., Liang, Y.-C., Bancal, J.-D., Brunner, N., & Gisin, N. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.052113 · Cited by 25
Das, T., Prabhu, R., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022319 · Cited by 24
Experimental high fidelity six-photon entangled state for telecloning protocols
Rådmark, M., Żukowski, M., & Bourennane, M. (2009) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/103016 · Cited by 22
Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger theorem for N qudits
Ryu, J., Lee, C., Żukowski, M., & Lee, J. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.042101 · Cited by 28
Solving large-scale optimization problems related to Bell’s Theorem
Gondzio, J., Gruca, J., Hall, J. A. J., Laskowski, W., & Żukowski, M. (2013) · Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/j.cam.2013.12.003 · Cited by 24
Controllability of symmetric spin networks
Albertini, F., & D’Alessandro, D. (2018) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5004652 · Cited by 24
Jebarathinam, C., Das, D., Roy, A., Mukherjee, A., Bhattacharya, S. S., Bhattacharya, B., Riccardi, A., & Sarkar, D. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.022101 · Cited by 22
Tomography of a Feedback Measurement with Photon Detection
Izumi, S., Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S., & Andersen, U. L. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.070502 · Cited by 22
Borsten, L., Dahanayake, D., Duff, M. J., & Rubens, W. (2010) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.105023 · Cited by 24
The relativity of quantum predictions
Pitowsky, I. (1991) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(91)90926-y · Cited by 24
Jaynes-Cummings model with a collective atomic mode
Zheng, S. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.045802 · Cited by 24
Detection of N -particle entanglement with generalized Bell inequalities
Laskowski, W., & Żukowski, M. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.062112 · Cited by 24
Estimation of gradients in quantum metrology
Altenburg, S., Oszmaniec, M., Wölk, S., & Gühne, O. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.042319 · Cited by 23
Entangled graphs: a classification of four-qubit entanglement
Gharahi, M., & Akhtarshenas, S. J. (2016) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2016-60729-1 · Cited by 23
Liang, Y.-C., Curchod, F. J., Bowles, J., & Gisin, N. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.130401 · Cited by 24
Multisetting Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger theorem
Ryu, J., Lee, C., Yin, Z., Rahaman, R., Angelakis, D. G., Lee, J., & Żukowski, M. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.024103 · Cited by 24
Jaffe, A. M., Jiang, C., Liu, Z., Ren, Y., & Wu, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2002813117 · Cited by 26
Retrocausal model of reality for quantum fields
Drummond, P. D., & Reid, M. D. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033266 · Cited by 24
Efficient adiabatic preparation of tensor network states
Wei, Z.-Y., Malz, D., & Cirac, J. I. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.l022037 · Cited by 27
Dicke-state preparation through global transverse control of Ising-coupled qubits
Stojanović, V. M., & Nauth, J. K. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.012608 · Cited by 23
Improved local models and new Bell inequalities via Frank-Wolfe algorithms
Designolle, S., Iommazzo, G., Besançon, M., Knebel, S., Gelß, P., & Pokutta, S. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.043059 · Cited by 23
Schemes for Splitting Quantum Information via Tripartite Entangled States
Zhang, Q.-Y., Zhan, Y.-B., Zhang, L., & MA, P.-C. (2009) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-009-0135-6 · Cited by 22
Contextualist viewpoint to Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger paradox
Khrennikov, A. Y. (2001) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(00)00804-5 · Cited by 22
Remote Preparation of an Arbitrary Two-Qubit State with Three-Party
Luo, M.-X., Chen, X., Ma, S.-Y., Yang, Y., & Hu, Z. (2010) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-010-0308-3 · Cited by 22
Generating topological order from a two-dimensional cluster state using a duality mapping
Brown, B. J., Son, W., Kraus, C. V., Fazio, R., & Vedral, V. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/065010 · Cited by 25
Characterizing Genuine Multisite Entanglement in Isotropic Spin Lattices
Dhar, H. S., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.070501 · Cited by 21
Unitarity as Preservation of Entropy and Entanglement in Quantum Systems
Hulpke, F., Poulsen, U. V., Sanpera, A., Sen, A., Sen, U., & Lewenstein, M. (2006) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-005-9035-7 · Cited by 25
Quantum teleportation and superdense coding through the composite W-Bell channel
Zhang, Z., Shu, L., & Mo, Z. (2012) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-012-0504-6 · Cited by 23
Realizing exactly solvable SU(N) magnets with thermal atoms
Beverland, M. E., Alagic, G., Martin, M. J., Koller, A., Rey, A. M., & Gorshkov, A. V. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.051601 · Cited by 23
A monomial matrix formalism to describe quantum many-body states
den Nest, M. V. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/12/123004 · Cited by 19
Quantum simulations in phase-space: from quantum optics to ultra-cold physics
Drummond, P. D., & Chaturvedi, S. (2016) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/91/7/073007 · Cited by 23
Wen, J., & Rubin, M. H. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.025802 · Cited by 24
W state and Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state in quantum three-person prisoner's dilemma
Han, Y., Zhang, Y.-S., & Guo, G. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)00168-8 · Cited by 23
QDENSITY—A Mathematica Quantum Computer simulation
Juliá-Díaz, B., Burdis, J. M., & Frank Tabakin, A. (2006) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2005.12.021 · Cited by 23
Sequential Path Entanglement for Quantum Metrology
Jin, X., Peng, C.-Z., Deng, Y., Barbieri, M., Nunn, J., & Walmsley, I. A. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01779 · Cited by 21
N-measurement Bell inequalities, N-atom entangled states, and the nonlocality of one photon
Hardy, L. (1991) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(91)90196-f · Cited by 23
Bipartite Bell Inequalities for Hyperentangled States
Cabello, A. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.140406 · Cited by 23
“The problem for testing EPR-BIs is the difficulty of having perfect correlations in actual experiments.”
BackgroundSub-Planck structures: Analogies between the Heisenberg-Weyl and SU(2) groups
Akhtar, N., Sanders, B. C., & Navarrete–Benlloch, C. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.053711 · Cited by 21
Witnessing Nonequilibrium Entanglement Dynamics in a Strongly Correlated Fermionic Chain
Baykusheva, D., Kalthoff, M. H., Hofmann, D., Claassen, M., Kennes, D. M., Sentef, M. A., & Mitrano, M. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.106902 · Cited by 22
Entanglement patterns in mutually unbiased basis sets
Lawrence, J. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.022338 · Cited by 21
Particle addition and subtraction channels and the behavior of composite particles
Kurzyński, P., Ramanathan, R., Soeda, A., Chuan, T. K., & Kaszlikowski, D. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093047 · Cited by 22
Optimal condition for measurement observable via error-propagation
Zhong, W., Lu, X.-M., Jing, X.-X., & Wang, X. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/38/385304 · Cited by 22
A Contextualised General Systems Theory
Kitto, K. (2014) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems2040541 · Cited by 30
Proposed direct test of a certain type of noncontextuality in quantum mechanics
Svozil, K. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.040102 · Cited by 20
Joint Remote Preparation of an Arbitrary Five-Qubit Brown State
Luo, M., Jia-yin, P., & Mo, Z. (2012) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-012-1372-7 · Cited by 22
Experimental Violation of Bell’s Inequality beyond Tsirelson’s Bound
Chen, Y.-A., Yang, T., Zhang, A., Zhao, Z., Cabello, A., & Pan, J.-W. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.170408 · Cited by 20
Robust multipartite quantum correlations without complex encodings
Chaves, R., Aolita, L., & Acín, A. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.020301 · Cited by 19
Gao, Y., Zhou, H., Zou, D., Peng, X., & Du, J. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.032335 · Cited by 22
Experimental test of generalized Hardy’s paradox
Luo, Y.-H., Su, H.-Y., Huang, H.-L., Wang, X., Yang, T., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Chen, J., Lu, C., & Pan, J.-W. (2018) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2018.11.025 · Cited by 21
Quantum thermal transistors: Operation characteristics in steady state versus transient regimes
Ghosh, R., Ghoshal, A., & Sen, U. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.052613 · Cited by 22
EPR correlations and EPW distributions revisited
Johansen, L. M. (1997) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(97)00784-6 · Cited by 22
Kunkri, S., Choudhary, S. K., Ahanj, A., et al. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.022346 · Cited by 22
“However, for most of the other entangled states maximum probability of success of this argument is more than that of the Hardy’s argument.”
Minimal assumption derivation of a weak Clauser–Horne inequality
Portmann, S., & Wüthrich, A. (2007) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.02.002 · Cited by 20
“3E.g. GHZ-type theorem’s (Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger (1989)) foremost achievement is simplicity.”
BackgroundMulti-atom entanglement engineering and phase-covariant cloning via adiabatic passage
Zheng, S. (2005) · Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/7/5/003 · Cited by 22
Endrejat, J., & Büttner, H. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.012305 · Cited by 22
Teleportation via maximally and non-maximally entangled mixed statesPreprint
Adhikari, S., Majumdar, A. S., Roy, S., et al. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.5555/2011362.2011365 · Cited by 22
Certainty and Uncertainty in Quantum Information ProcessingPreprint
Rieffel, E. G. (2007) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0702121 · Cited by 22
The Concept of Quantum State: New Views on old Phenomena
Paty, M. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0111-3_23 · Cited by 22
A Critical Review of Works Pertinent to the Einstein-Bohr Debate and Bell’s Theorem
Hess, K. (2022) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym14010163 · Cited by 24
“The recent measurements by Zeilinger and coworkers [34,35] go to extraordinary length to show the independence of the λn from the Wollaston angle-pair-settings to close the loophole against super-deterministic objections, such as Gerard ’t Hooft’s rejection of “Free Will”.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEntanglement polygon inequality in qudit systems
Yang, X., Yang, Y., & Luo, M. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.062402 · Cited by 21
Dissipative Dynamics of Graph-State Stabilizers with Superconducting Qubits
Shirizly, L., Misguich, G., & Landa, H. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.010601 · Cited by 20
Free-electron interactions with photonic GKP states: Universal control and quantum error correction
Baranes, G., Even-Haim, S., Ruimy, R., Gorlach, A. A., Dahan, R., Diringer, A. A., Hacohen-Gourgy, S., & Kaminer, I. E. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.043271 · Cited by 21
No Quantum Realization of Extremal No-Signaling Boxes
Ramanathan, R., Tuziemski, J., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, P. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.050401 · Cited by 22
Position measurements in the de Broglie–Bohm interpretation of quantum mechanics
Naaman-Marom, G., Noam Erez, A., & Lev Vaidman, A. (2012) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2012.07.005 · Cited by 21
Genuinely high-dimensional nonlocality optimized by complementary measurements
Lim, J., Ryu, J., Yoo, S., Lee, C., Bang, J., & Lee, J. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/10/103012 · Cited by 19
Logical independence and quantum randomness
Paterek, T., Kofler, J., Prevedel, R., Klimek, P., Aspelmeyer, M., Zeilinger, A., & Brukner, Č. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/1/013019 · Cited by 24
Scaling of multiple postselected quantum gates in optics
Ralph, T. C. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.012312 · Cited by 20
Violation of Bell’s inequality by macroscopic states generated via parametric down-conversion
Munro, W. J., & Reid, M. D. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.4412 · Cited by 21
Macroscopic bound entanglement in thermal graph states
Cavalcanti, D., Aolita, L., Ferraro, A., García-Sáez, A., & Acín, A. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/2/025011 · Cited by 20
Svozil, K. (2008) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2008.06.012 · Cited by 22
Production of multipartite entanglement for electron spins in quantum dots
Bodoky, F., & Blaauboer, M. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.052309 · Cited by 20
Theory and experiment in the foundations of quantum theory
Whitaker, M. A. B. (2000) · Progress in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1016/s0079-6727(00)00002-1 · Cited by 20
A nonextensive critical phenomenon scenario for quantum entanglement
Tsallis, C., Lamberti, P. W., & Prato, D. P. (2001) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/s0378-4371(01)00070-x · Cited by 19
Transverse correlations in triphoton entanglement: Geometrical and physical optics
Wen, J., Xu, P., Rubin, M. H., & Shih, Y. H. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.023828 · Cited by 21
Zou, X., & Mathis, W. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.022306 · Cited by 21
Outcomes in Branching Space-Time and GHZ-Bell Theorems
Kowalski, T., & Placek, T. (1999) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/50.3.349 · Cited by 21
Munro, W. J., & Milburn, G. J. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.4285 · Cited by 22
The Separability versus Entanglement Problem
Das, S., Chanda, T., Lewenstein, M., Sanpera, A., De, A. S., & Sen, U. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527805785.ch8 · Cited by 27
Contextual Inferences, Nonlocality, and the Incompleteness of Quantum Mechanics
Grangier, P. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23121660 · Cited by 21
“Sci. (2021) https ://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09716-7 [arXiv:1907.11267] [11] D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, in “Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe”, edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989).”
BackgroundInfluentialMultipartite Bell-type inequality by generalizing Wigner's argument
Home, D., Saha, D., & Das, S. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.012102 · Cited by 19
Quantum Secret Sharing of Secure Direct Communication Using One-Time Pad
Du, R., Sun, Z., Wang, B.-H., & Long, D. (2012) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-012-1147-1 · Cited by 19
Quantum teleportation with partially entangled states via noisy channels
Liang, H.-Q., Liu, J., Feng, S., & Chen, J.-G. (2013) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-013-0555-3 · Cited by 20
Experimental test of entangled histories
Cotler, J. S., Duan, L., Hou, P., Wilczek, F. A., Xu, D., Yin, Z., & Zu, C. (2017) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2017.09.004 · Cited by 20
Classical multiparty computation using quantum resources
Clementi, M., Pappa, A., Eckstein, A., et al. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.062317 · Cited by 20
Lin, P.-S., Hung, J.-C., Chen, C.-H., & Liang, Y.-C. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.062338 · Cited by 20
EPR Paradox, Locality and Completeness of Quantum Theory
Kupczyński, M., Adenier, G., Khrennikov, A. Y., LAHTI, P. J., Man’ko, V. I., & Nieuwenhuizen, T. M. (2007) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.2827317 · Cited by 21
“Precise new experiments [13,14] permitted to close several loopholes, confirmed QT predictions for the correlation functions and even allowed to detect strange anomalies in various detection rates reported recently by Adenier and Khrennikov [15].”
ResultBell-Klyshko Inequalities to Characterize Maximally Entangled Statesof n Qubits
Chen, Z. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.110403 · Cited by 20
Bipartite units of nonlocality
Förster, M., & Wolf, S. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.042112 · Cited by 19
Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger States and Few-Body Hamiltonians
Facchi, P., Florio, G., Pascazio, S., et al. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.260502 · Cited by 20
Noise in Mermin’sn-particle Bell inequality
Braunstein, S. L., & Mann, A. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.r2427 · Cited by 20
Data teleportation: The quantum space race
Merali, Z. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/492022a · Cited by 20
W state generation by adding independent single photons
Hu, J., & Lin, Q. (2015) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-015-1030-0 · Cited by 19
Entanglement distance for arbitrary M -qudit hybrid systems
Cocchiarella, D., Scali, S., Ribisi, S., Nardi, B., Bel-Hadj-Aissa, G., & Franzosi, R. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.042129 · Cited by 19
Estimating multipartite entanglement measures
Osterloh, A., & Hyllus, P. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.022307 · Cited by 19
Mermin inequalities for perfect correlations in many-qutrit systems
Lawrence, J. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.042123 · Cited by 19
Lu, S., Irfan, A. A., Shen, J., Kuhn, S. J., Snow, W. M., Baxter, D. V., Pynn, R., & Ortíz, G. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.042318 · Cited by 19
Device-independent characterization of entanglement based on bell nonlocality
Chen, G., Zhang, W.-H., Yin, P., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2021) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2021.01.004 · Cited by 21
Wang, Y., Hu, P.-C., & Xu, Q. (2021) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-021-04925-7 · Cited by 19
How to simulate a universal quantum computer using negative probabilities
Hofmann, H. F. (2009) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/27/275304 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Kafatos, M. C.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Menas C. Kafatos
- ORCID
- Menas C. Kafatos
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1989
- OpenAlex
- W580957117
- Cited by
- 1,632
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 69
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- George Mason University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- Bell's theorem, quantum nonseparability, Bell inequalities, measurement problem, wave function collapse, weak values, hidden variables, locality, EPR paradox, quantum entanglement, quantum cosmology, inflation, cosmological singularity, quantum information, complementarity, quantum ontology, quantum foundations, cellular automata, phase-space model, separability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review