The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scaling of multiple postselected quantum gates in optics
Abstract
We show that interesting multigate circuits can be constructed using a postselected controlled-sign gate that works with a probability ${(1∕3)}^{n}$, where $n\ensuremath{-}1$ is the number of controlled-sign gates in the circuit, rather than ${(1∕9)}^{n\ensuremath{-}1}$, as would be expected from a sequence of such gates. We suggest some quantum information tasks which could be demonstrated using these circuits, such as parity checking and cluster-state computation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The success probability of an array of n CZ gates of this type can be made p = (1/3)^{n+1}, rather than p = (1/9)^n.
“It was also shown that the success probability of an array of n CZ gates of this type can be made to operate with a probability of p = (1/3) n+1 , rather than p = (1/9) n (Ralph 2004).”
From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Ralph 2004
Citations
Cites
Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe
(1989) · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4 · Cited by 1,632
Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Branning, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02054 · Cited by 992
Self-citationLinear optical controlled-NOT gate in the coincidence basis
Ralph, T. C., Langford, N. K., Bell, T. B., & White, A. G. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.062324 · Cited by 346
Self-citationExperimental controlled-NOT logic gate for single photons in the coincidence basis
Pittman, T. B., Fitch, M. J., Jacobs, B. C., & Franson, J. D. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.032316 · Cited by 328
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.022313 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.037903 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042328 · DOI
- 10.1109/JSTQE.2003.820943 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.024308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Self-citationExperimental Demonstration of a Compiled Version of Shor’s Algorithm with Quantum Entanglement
Lanyon, B. P., Weinhold, T. J., Langford, N. K., Barbieri, M., James, D. F. V., Gilchrist, A., & White, A. G. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.250505 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Ralph, T. C.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-07-27
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
