The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
Nilsson, N. J. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0 · Cited by 10,583
Gamst, F. C. (1991) · Anthropology of Work Review · doi:10.1525/awr.1991.12.3.19 · Cited by 7,932
Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3664 · Cited by 4,014
Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926620 · Cited by 3,091
Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research
Kramer, R., & Tyler, T. (1996) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452243610 · Cited by 2,782
Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships
Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996) · Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research · doi:10.4135/9781452243610.n7 · Cited by 2,595
Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory
Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258627 · Cited by 941
Agent-based software engineering
Wooldridge, M. (1997) · IEE Proceedings - Software Engineering · doi:10.1049/ip-sen:19971026 · Cited by 803
Modelling social action for AI agents
Castelfranchi, C. (1998) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00056-3 · Cited by 546
Italian National Research Council, Conte, R., & Castelfranchi, C. (1995) · Garland Science eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203783221 · Cited by 543
Cited by
Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001 · Cited by 3,613
“The purpose of trusted third-party seals is to help reduce consumers' perceived risk in electronic commerce, provide assurance to consumers that a Website discloses and follows its operating practices, that it handles payments in a secure and reliable way, that it has certain return policies, and/or that it complies w…”
BackgroundReview on Computational Trust and Reputation Models
Sabater, J., & Sierra, C. (2005) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-004-0041-5 · Cited by 911
Pavlou, P. A. (2002) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/s0963-8687(02)00017-3 · Cited by 510
The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design
Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.01.001 · Cited by 508
Toward a Generic Model of Trust for Electronic Commerce
(2000) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2000.11044201 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2001
- OpenAlex
- W1500109124
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 22.98
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-017-3614-5
- The paper
- Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies. (2001). Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3614-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
