The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking About Spatial Thinking: New Typology, New Assessments
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
D., C. P., Rosch, E., & Loyd, B. B. (1979) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421578 · Cited by 5,264
Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies
Carroll, J. B. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571312 · Cited by 4,121
(1997) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089297765555359 · Cited by 3,916
Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children
Heckman, J. J. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128898 · Cited by 3,559
Human cognitive abilities a survey of factor-analytic studies
Carroll, J. B. (2004) · Cited by 3,394
Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. B. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032633275 · Cited by 2,829
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016127 · Cited by 1,846
Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.09.005 · Cited by 820
ISHIKAWA, T., & MONTELLO, D. (2006) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.08.003 · Cited by 640 · cited 1×
“We began by confirming the results of Ishikawa and Montello (2006) showing that there are pronounced individual differences in forming cognitive maps, even in a situation in which participants walk rather than being passively driven (Schinazi, Epstein, Nardi, Newcombe & Shipley, 2009).”
ResultA dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability
Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03200477 · Cited by 629
Cited by
GPS use negatively affects environmental learning through spatial transformation abilities
Ruginski, I. T., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Stefanucci, J. K., & Cashdan, E. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.001 · Cited by 137
The Connection Between Spatial and Mathematical Ability Across Development
Young, C. J., Levine, S. C., & Mix, K. S. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00755 · Cited by 133
Evidence for a unitary structure of spatial cognition beyond general intelligence
Malanchini, M., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N. G., McMillan, A., Schofield, K. L., Rodic, M., Rossi, V., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. S., Tucker-Drob, E. M., et al. (2020) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-020-0067-8 · Cited by 69
Prenatal testosterone does not explain sex differences in spatial ability
Toivainen, T., Pannini, G., Papageorgiou, K. A., Malanchini, M., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N., & Kovas, Y. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31704-y · Cited by 26
Spatial anxiety and self-confidence mediate sex/gender differences in mental rotation
Arrighi, L., & Hausmann, M. (2022) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.053596.122 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F.
- Venue
- Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2014-11-09
- Pages
- 179-192
- OpenAlex
- W1927610416
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 38.97
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thinking About Spatial Thinking: New Typology, New Assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_10
- The paper
- Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2015). Thinking About Spatial Thinking: New Typology, New Assessments. Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
