CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 480

A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability

Kozhevnikov, Maria, Hegarty, Mary·2001·Memory & Cognition
DOI 10.3758/bf03200477
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03200477

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Perspective Taking Test (PTT) was introduced by Kozhevnikov & Hegarty (2001) as a test of spatial orientation.

    “Perspective taking test (PTT). This was introduced by Kozhevnikov & Hegarty (2001) as a test of spatial orientation.”

    From Does Spatial Cognition Emerge in Frontier Models? (2024) · cites this paper as Kozhevnikov & Hegarty (2001)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Barratt, E. S. (1953). An analysis of verbal reports of solving spatial problems as an aid in defining spatial factors. Journal of Psychology, 36, 17-25.
  2. Bryant, D., & Tversky, B. (1999). Mental representations of perspec- tive and spatial relations from diagrams and models. Journal of Ex- perimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 137-156.
  3. Bryant, K. (1982). Personality correlates of sense of direction and ge- ographical orientation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 43, 1318-1324.
  4. Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1986). Spatial ability: An information- processing approach to psychometrics. In R. J. Stenberg (Ed.), Ad- vances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 3, pp. 221-252).
  5. Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experi- mental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 483-500.
  6. Guilford, J. P., & Zimmerman,W. S. (1948). The Guilford-Zimmerman Aptitude Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 24-34.
  7. Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowl- edge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 181-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  8. McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889-918.
  9. Muller, R. U., Kubie, J. L., Bostock, E. M., Taube, J. S., & Quirk, G. J. (1991). Spatial firing correlates of neurons in the hippocampus formation of freely moving rats. In J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and space (pp. 269-333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Paillard, J. (1991). Brain and space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Presson, C. C. (1982). Strategies in spatial reasoning. Journal of Ex- perimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 8, 243-251.
  13. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learn- ing, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1157-1165.
  14. Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Profitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 151-168.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M.
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2001-07
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
745-756
ISSN
  • 0090-502X
  • 1532-5946
DOI
10.3758/bf03200477
Cited by
480
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review