Cited by 132Reflective Practices in EducationQualitative Research Methods and EthicsTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Developing Critical Reflection as a Research Method

Fook, Jan·2011·Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching

Abstract

Critical reflection is normally used in professional learning settings to assist practitioners to improve practice. I have worked for some time using critical reflection in this way with many different types of professionals. Over time, however, I have been impressed by the deeper and more complex understanding of practice experience which the process enables, and which practitioners themselves often cannot initially express. And so I have begun to speculate about the research potential of the critical reflection process, and whether it might be developed as a research method to allow better formulations of practice experience, and therefore, ultimately, better practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-6091-761-5_6

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Critical reflection is a valuable method in education research, particularly when exploring one's professional practice.

    “Critical reflection is a valuable method in education research, particularly when exploring one's professional practice (Fook, 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fook, J.
Corresponding author
Fook, Jan
Venue
Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching
Published
2011
Pages
55-64
OpenAlex
W1933040365
Cited by
132
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.26
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SensePublishers eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
critical reflection, professional learning, practice experience, reflective practice, professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review