Critical Reflection: An Imperative Skill for Social Work Practice in Neoliberal Organisations?
Open accessAbstract
Social work practice and education have been significantly impacted by neoliberal governmentality, which can greatly undermine the espoused social justice mission of social work. This study explores the research questions: How might critical reflection support social work practice in neoliberal organisations? And how might critical analysis using insights from critical theorists fortify the findings of critically reflective research? This study uses critical reflection on a critical incident (from Author 2’s practice) as a methodology to respond to the first research question. It further analyses the findings of the critically reflective inquiry by drawing on relevant concepts from critical theorists to respond to the second question and expand the possibilities for practitioners to develop emancipatory practices in neoliberal organisations. The findings suggest critical reflection on the critical incident examined was effective in improving social work practice, and that additional critical analysis of the wider issues raised by the research findings may enhance social work as a value-driven, client-centred and social change-oriented profession. The article highlights the benefits and outcomes of working in a critically reflective way, and makes an original contribution to the growing literature that suggests critical reflection is a vital skill for social work practice in neoliberal organisations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Role of NGOs and Civil Society in Development and Poverty Reduction
Banks, N., & Hulme, D. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2072157 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Developing Critical Reflection as a Research Method
Fook, J. (2011) · Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching · doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-761-5_6 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Morley, C., & O’Bree, C.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Morley, Christine
- Venue
- Social Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-03-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 97
- ISSN
- 2076-0760 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3134444980
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Sciences and Policies
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Keywords
- critical reflection, social work practice, neoliberalism, neoliberal governmentality, critical incidents, critical theory, emancipatory practice, social justice, client-centered practice, social change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review