CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 39Artificial Intelligence in LawDigitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Law and Artificial Intelligence: Regulating AI and Applying AI in Legal Practice

Open access
Kostina Prifti, Stamhuis, Evert, Heine, Klaus, Bart H. M. Custers, Eduard Fosch‐Villaronga·2022·Information Technology and Law Series
DOI 10.1007/978-94-6265-523-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This book provides an in-depth overview of what is currently happening in the field of Law and Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-6265-523-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Copyright violations in images are easier to pinpoint and prosecute in the legal system.

    “Another possible reason is that copyright violations in images are easier to pinpoint and prosecute in the legal system [52].”

    From Rethinking open source generative AI: open washing and the EU AI Act (2024) · cites this paper as [52]

    The passages from “Digging into the Accountability Gap” (§§19.3–19.5; page not provided) address liability for AI systems in healthcare, not copyright infringement. Further searches for image copyright and detection or enforcement of copyright infringement found no passage in our copy saying that violations involving images are easier to identify or prosecute. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Abraham K S and Weiler P C (1994) Enterprise Medical Liability and the Evolution of the American Health Care System, Harvard Law Review 108:381-436
  2. Alpaydin E (2016) Machine Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
  3. Arlen J (1994) The Potentially Perverse Effects of Corporate Criminal Liability, Journal of Legal Studies 23:832-867
  4. Cebul R D et al (2008) Organizational Fragmentation and Care Quality in the U.S. Health Care System, Journal of Economic Perspectives 22:93-113
  5. Chesterman S (2020) Artificial intelligence and the limits of legal personality, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 69:819-844
  6. Cooter R and Ulen Th (2012) Law and Economics. 6 th Ed. Addison-Wesley, Boston
  7. Easterbrook F H and Fischel D R (1989) The Corporate Contract, Columbia Law Review 89:1416-1448
  8. Ficuciello F et al (2019) Autonomy in surgical robots and its meaningful human control. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0002 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fosch-Villaronga E (2019) Robots, Healthcare and the Law: Regulating Automation in Personal Care. Routledge, New York
  10. Galasso A and Luo H (2019) Punishing Robots: Issues in the Economics of Tort Liability and Innovation in Artificial Intelligence. In: Ajay A et al (eds), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. University of Chicago Press, Chicago pp. 493-504
  11. Heine K and Grabovets K (2015) From individuals to organizations: The puzzle of organizational liability in tort law, Dovenschmidt Quarterly 2:44-53
  12. Heine K and Li S (2019) What Shall we do with the Drunken Sailor? Product Safety in the Aftermath of 3D Printing, European Journal of Risk Regulation 10:23-40
  13. Jensen M C and Meckling W H (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3:305-360
  14. Karnow C EA (1996) Liability for distributed artificial intelligences, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 11:147-204
  15. Koch B (2011) Medical Liability in Europe: A Comparison of Selected Jurisdictions. De Gruyter, Berlin
  16. Koudijs P and Salisbury L (2020) Limited liability and investment: Evidence from changes in marital property laws in the US South, 1840-1850, Journal of Financial Economics 138:1-26
  17. O'Quinn J C (2000) Not-So-Strict Liability: A Foreseeability Test for Rylands v. Fletcher and Other Lessons from Cambridge Water Co. v. Eastern Counties Leather PLC, Harvard Environmental Law Review 24:287-314
  18. Pistor K et al (2002) Evolution of Corporate Law: A Cross-Country Comparison, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 23:791-872
  19. Posner R A (1972) A Theory of Negligence, Journal of Legal Studies 1:29-96
  20. Posner R A (2011) Economic Analysis of Law. 8 th Ed. Wolters-Kluwer, New York
  21. Rachum-Twaig O (2020) Whose Robot Is It Anyway?: Liability for Artificial-Intelligence-Based Robots, University of Illinois Law Review 4:1141-1175
  22. Shavell S (2007) Economic Analysis of Accident Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA
  23. Shishehgar M et al. (2018) A systematic review of research into how robotic technology can help older people, Smart Health 7:1-18
  24. Simon H (1960) The Corporation: Will it be Managed by Machines. In: Ansehn M and Bach G L (eds), Management and Corporations. Mc Graw Hill, New York pp.17-55
  25. Teubner G (2018) Digital Personhood? The Status of Autonomous Software Agents in Private Law. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3177096 · DOI
  26. van Dam C (2013) European Tort Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prifti, K., Stamhuis, E., Heine, K., Custers, B. H. M., & Fosch‐Villaronga, E.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Stamhuis, Evert
ORCID
Venue
Information Technology and Law Series
Publisher
T.M.C. Asser Press
Published
2022
ISSN
  • 1570-2782 (ISSN-L)
  • 2215-1966
DOI
10.1007/978-94-6265-523-2
OpenAlex
W4285112310
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
15.71
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Information technology and law series/Information technology & law series (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence, law and technology, AI regulation, AI governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review