Cited by 10Mental Health via WritingSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningEmotion and Mood Recognition

Depression Detection Among Social Media Users Using Machine Learning

Verma, Prashant, Sharma, Kapil, Walia, Gurjit Singh·2021·Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-15-5113-0_72

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verma, P., Sharma, K., & Walia, G. S.
Affiliations
  • Delhi Technological University (IN)
  • Defence Research and Development Organisation (IN)
Corresponding author
Verma, Prashant
Venue
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Published
2020-08-02
Pages
865-874
ISSN
  • 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5365
OpenAlex
W3046477338
Cited by
10
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.05
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
depression detection, social media, sentiment analysis, user mood, mental health monitoring, online communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review