Cited by 4Emotion and Mood RecognitionNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Wearable Physiological Stress Monitoring System—A Proof-of-Concept Study

Ong, Siew Woon, Sundar, Raghav, Bandla, Aishwarya, Kim, Noori·2021·IRC-SET 2020

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-15-9472-4_54

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ong, S. W., Sundar, R., Bandla, A., & Kim, N.
Affiliations
  • Singapore Institute of Technology (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Newcastle University Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Bandla, Aishwarya
  • Kim, Noori
Venue
IRC-SET 2020
Published
2021
Pages
623-633
OpenAlex
W3161259320
Cited by
4
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.36
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
physiological stress monitoring, wearable sensors, skin conductance, pulse rate, thermal pain, physical activity, stress detection, sensor placement, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review