Cited by 7Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceMisinformation and Its Impacts

Applying Deep Learning for Extremism Detection

Mussiraliyeva, Shynar, Omarov, Batyrkhan, Bolatbek, Milana, Ospanov, Ruslan, Baispay, Gulshat, Medetbek, Zhanar, Yeltay, Zhastay·2021·Communications in Computer and Information Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-16-3660-8_56

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stemming is effective for high-volume data like chat logs or social media posts, where lexical diversity could obscure threat signals.

    “Stemming is effective for high-volume data like chat logs or social media posts, where lexical diversity could obscure threat signals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mussiraliyeva, S., Omarov, B., Bolatbek, M., Ospanov, R., Baispay, G., Medetbek, Z., & Yeltay, Z.
Affiliations
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ)
Venue
Communications in Computer and Information Science
Published
2021
Pages
597-605
ISSN
  • 1865-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-0937
OpenAlex
W3175002007
Cited by
7
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications in computer and information science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
deep learning, social media, radicalization, online radicalization, text classification, terrorist recruitment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review