The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leveling the Playing Field for Students with Disabilities in Online Opportunities
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Academic Ableism: Disability and Higher Education
Dolmage, J. (2017) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9708722 · Cited by 884
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Aluri, L. (2020, August 25). Digital accessibility in the age of COVID-19. American Association of People with Disabilities. https://www.aapd.com/digital-accessibility-covid-19/ · DOI
- Burgstahler, S. (Ed). (2015). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice. Harvard Education Press.
- Burgstahler, S. (2020). Creating inclusive learning opportunities: A universal design toolkit. Harvard Education Press.
- Catalano, A. (2014). Improving distance education for students with special needs: A qualitative study of students’ experiences with an online library research course. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(1–2), 17–31. · DOI
- Fichten, C. S., Ferraro, V., Asuncion, J. V., Chwojka, C., Barile, M., Nguyen, M. N., Klomp, R., & Wolforth, J. (2009). Disabilities and e-learning problems and solutions: An exploratory study. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 241–256.
- Kumar, K. L., & Wideman, M. (2014). Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first-year undergraduate course. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 125–147. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1028772.pdf · DOI · Paper page
- Rao, K., & Tanners, A. (2011). Curb cuts in cyberspace: Universal instructional design for online courses. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(3), 211–229. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ966125.pdf
- Roberts, J. B., Crittenden, L. A., & Crittenden, J. C. (2011). Students with disabilities and online learning: A cross-institutional study of perceived satisfaction with accessibility compliance and services. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 242–250. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Higher education leaders’ perspectives of accessible and inclusive online learning
Lomellini, A., Lowenthal, P. R., Snelson, C., & Trespalacios, J. H. (2022) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2022.2141608 · Cited by 31
Instructional Designers’ Perceptions of Accessible and Inclusive Online Course Design
Lomellini, A., Lowenthal, P. R., Trespalacios, J., & Snelson, C. (2024) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v28i4.3719 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgstahler, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burgstahler, Sheryl
- ORCID
- Burgstahler, Sheryl
- Venue
- Bridging Marginality through Inclusive Higher Education
- Publisher
- Springer Singapore
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 235-250
- OpenAlex
- W4220994594
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- students with disabilities, online learning, Universal Design for Learning, accessibility, digital inclusion, COVID-19 pandemic, ADA compliance, social inclusion, inclusive campus, diversity, equity, and inclusion, postsecondary education, online course design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
