Cited by 12Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Clinical Databases for Breast Cancer Research

Hwang, Ki-Tae·2021·Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Clinical database is a collection of clinical data related to patients, which can be used for analysis and research. Clinical data can be classified into several categories: patient-related, tumor-related, diagnostics-related, treatment-related, outcome-related, administration-related, and other clinical data. Clinical databases can be classified according to the data types of clinical databases, ranges of institutes, and accessibility to data. The numbers of papers and clinical trials are rapidly increasing. Recently, more than 9000 papers related to breast cancer have been published annually, and more than 7000 papers related to human breast cancer are published annually. The speed of increase is expected to be faster and faster in future. Now, almost 8000 clinical trials are registered world widely. Main research areas of breast cancer can be classified into followings; epidemiology, screening and prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Clinical databases that are available for breast cancer research are also introduced in this chapter. The analysis of big data is expected to be the mainstream of breast cancer research using clinical databases. As the technology of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving, the technology of deep learning starts to be applied for breast cancer research. In near future, AI technology is predicted to penetrate deeply the field of breast cancer research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-32-9620-6_26

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The large portion of breast and lung cancer studies can likely be attributed to their high prevalence and extensive clinical data availability, providing a rich dataset for deploying and testing LLMs.

    “which can likely be attributed to their high prevalence and extensive clinical data availability, providing a rich dataset for deploying and testing the efficacy of LLMs [43]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hwang, K.-T.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Hwang, Ki-Tae
Venue
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Published
2021
Volume
1187
Pages
493-509
ISSN
  • 0065-2598 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-8019
OpenAlex
W3161329058
Cited by
12
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.61
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in experimental medicine and biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
breast cancer, medical databases, medical data classification, clinical trials, big data analytics, artificial intelligence, deep learning, breast cancer epidemiology, breast cancer diagnosis, breast cancer treatment, breast cancer prognosis
MeSH terms
Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Humans, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review