Cited by 119Topic ModelingComputational and Text Analysis MethodsBayesian Methods and Mixture Models

Normalized Approach to Find Optimal Number of Topics in Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)

Hasan, Mahedi, Rahman, Anichur, Karim, Md. Razaul, Khan, Md. Saikat Islam, Islam, Md. Jahidul·2021·Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-33-4673-4_27

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasan, M., Rahman, A., Karim, M. R., Khan, M. S. I., & Islam, M. J.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research (BD)
  • Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University (BD)
  • Green University of Bangladesh (BD)
Corresponding author
Hasan, Mahedi
Venue
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Published
2020-12-17
Pages
341-354
ISSN
  • 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5365
OpenAlex
W3112924188
Cited by
119
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
11.18
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Keywords
latent Dirichlet allocation, topic modeling, topic coherence, perplexity, text feature extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review