Cited by 2Network Security and Intrusion DetectionPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

Insider Threat Detection in User Activity Data Using Optimized LSTM-AE

Kumar, M. Krishna, Kumari, Saloni, Bharathi, M., Lavanya, P., Glory, H. Anila, Sriram, V. S. Shankar·2025·Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-96-0451-7_21

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, M. K., Kumari, S., Bharathi, M., Lavanya, P., Glory, H. A., & Sriram, V. S. S.
Affiliations
SASTRA University (IN)
Corresponding author
Glory, H. Anila
Venue
Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies
Published
2025
Pages
287-300
ISSN
  • 2367-4512 (ISSN-L)
  • 2367-4520
OpenAlex
W4409100197
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Keywords
insider threat detection, user activity data, LSTM autoencoder, anomaly detection, user behavior analysis, intrusion detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review