Cited by 52Network Security and Intrusion DetectionInformation and Cyber SecurityUser Authentication and Security Systems

Temporal feature aggregation with attention for insider threat detection from activity logs

Pal, Preetam, Chattopadhyay, Pratik, Swarnkar, Mayank·2023·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119925

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pal et al. (2023) used stacked LSTM and GRU-based attention models for insider threat identification, demonstrating robustness with an average AUC of 0.99.

    “Pal et al. (2023) [49] focused on the identification of insider threats with the use of a combination of stacked LSTM as well as GRU-based attention models, demonstrating robustness with an average AUC of 0.99.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pal, P., Chattopadhyay, P., & Swarnkar, M.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology BHU (IN)
Corresponding author
Chattopadhyay, Pratik
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
224
Pages
119925
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4328053447
Cited by
52
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
Banaras Hindu University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
Keywords
insider threat detection, activity logs, temporal feature aggregation, attention mechanism, stacked LSTM, ensemble learning, class imbalance, user behavior modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review