Waste Water Remediation and Nanoadsorbents
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite promising adsorption capabilities and surface functionalities, large-scale application of nanoadsorbents remains hindered by challenges associated with recyclability, structural deterioration, and declining performance upon repeated use.
“Despite the promising adsorption capabilities and surface functionalities exhibited by various nanoadsorbents, their large-scale application remains hindered by challenges associated with recyclability, structural deterioration, and declining performance upon repeated use.”
From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [245]
EDTA-functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles achieved up to 98% regeneration efficiency using 0.5 M HCl, maintaining performance across 30 reuse cycles.
“Similarly, EDTA-functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles achieved up to 98% regeneration efficiency using 0.5 M HCl, maintaining performance across 30 reuse cycles.245”
From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [245]
Magnetic nanoadsorbents enable rapid and energy-efficient recovery under an external magnetic field.
“Magnetic nanoadsorbents have emerged as a promising strategy to overcome these limitations, enabling rapid and energy-efficient recovery under an external magnetic field.245,249”
From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [245]
The economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of nanoadsorbent-based water treatment technologies are fundamentally determined by their ability to be regenerated and reused effectively.
“The economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of nanoadsorbent-based water treatment technologies are fundamentally determined by their ability to be regenerated and reused effectively.”
From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [245]
Fe3O4-based nanocomposites and Fe@Au-graphene oxide hybrids have shown efficient magnetic separation and stable adsorption performance over multiple cycles.
“For example, Fe3O4-based nanocomposites and Fe@Au–graphene oxide hybrids have shown efficient magnetic separation and stable adsorption performance over multiple cycles, highlighting the potential of magnetically assisted recycling.245”
From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [245]
Fe/Cu nanoparticles exhibited higher As(iii) desorption efficiency under alkaline conditions, while acidic eluents were more effective for As(v).
“For instance, Fe/Cu nanoparticles exhibited higher As(iii) desorption efficiency under alkaline conditions, while acidic eluents were more effective for As(v).”
From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [245]
While regeneration and reuse of nanoadsorbents hold significant promise for enhancing sustainability and cost-effectiveness of water purification technologies, numerous technical, environmental, and regulatory challenges must be addressed before large-scale implementation.
“Overall, while the regeneration and reuse of nanoadsorbents hold significant promise for enhancing the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of water purification technologies, numerous technical, environmental, and regulatory challenges must be addressed before large-scale implementation.”
From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [245]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Patel, P. K., Singh, H. K., & Singh, A.
- Corresponding author
- Patel, Prabhat Kumar
- Venue
- Advances in Wastewater Research
- Publisher
- Springer Nature Singapore
- Published
- 2025
- Pages
- 235-257
- ISSN
- 3004-9725
- 3004-9733
- OpenAlex
- W4411740878
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Keywords
- wastewater treatment, nanoadsorbents, adsorption, nanotechnology, water pollution, activated carbon, chitosan, zeolites, clay, activated alumina, silica gel, sorption, pollutant removal, non-conventional water resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review