Cited by 528Cybernetics and Technology in SocietyEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and History of Science

Understanding Understanding

von Foerster, Heinz·2003·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/b97451

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The central notion of radical constructivism that the brain actively constructs a subjective reality from noisy and ambiguous sensory inputs is expressed formally in hierarchical Bayesian models.

    “the central notion of radical constructivism that the brain actively “constructs” a subjective reality from noisy and ambiguous sensory inputs (Richards and von Glasersfeld, 1979; von Foerster, 2003)—as opposed to the brain representing an objective outer reality that is reflected by sensory inputs—are expressed formally, using the language of probability theory, in hierarchical Bayesian models we”
  • Cognitive systems are self-referential and monitor themselves.

    “Other central ideas—such as the notion that cognitive systems are self-referential and monitor themselves (von Foerster, 2003) are yet to be exploited fully, e.g., for models of metacognition.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Foerster, H.
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2003
OpenAlex
W4253007761
Cited by
528
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.05
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • International Linear Collider (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
understanding, knowledge acquisition, information processing, cognition, epistemology, philosophy of science, Heinz von Foerster

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review