The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding ecological community succession: Causal models and theories, a review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
Constraints and Tradeoffs: Toward a Predictive Theory of Competition and Succession
Tilman, D. (1990) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3565355 · Cited by 750 · cited 1×
“theory, and recent developments in plant competition (e.g. Keddy 1989; Grace & Tilman 1990; Tilman 1990a) and vegetation theory (Pickett & Kolasa 1989; Wiegleb 1989).”
Background
Cited by
Modifying and reacting to the environmental pH can drive bacterial interactions
Ratzke, C., & Gore, J. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004248 · Cited by 455
Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscape
Tabacchi, E., Correll, D. L., Hauer, R., Pinay, G., Planty‐Tabacchi, A., & Wissmar, R. C. (1998) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00381.x · Cited by 398
Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests
Roberts, M. R. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b04-091 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- McCook, L. J.
- Venue
- Vegetatio
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-147
- ISSN
- 1385-0237 (ISSN-L)
- 0042-3106
- 1573-5052
- OpenAlex
- W2047465062
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
