The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests
Abstract
Most work on the disturbance ecology of North American forests has focused on the tree canopy and woody understory, with little consideration of the herbaceous layer. Understanding how this species-rich and ecologically important layer responds to natural disturbances is needed as a guide for conservation. As a framework for this review, selected natural disturbances common to North American forests are evaluated in terms of a three-axis model of disturbance severity: percentage of tree canopy removed, percentage of understory vegetation removed, and percentage of forest floor and soil removed or disrupted. Eight factors, which control herbaceous-layer response, are linked to the three axes; these factors vary in dominance, depending on disturbance type and severity. The relative importances of different species' regeneration mechanisms also vary along severity gradients. The disturbance-severity model, along with the linked response factors and regeneration mechanisms, provide a framework for evaluating impacts of both natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Long-term studies of herbaceous-layer response to disturbance are needed, particularly mechanistic studies that focus on the relative importance of the eight factors controlling response. The conceptual model proposed herein needs to be tested across the full spectrum of severity levels. Finally, comparisons between natural and anthropogenic disturbances are needed.Key words: disturbance, forests, herbaceous layer, life-history characteristics, succession, understory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754 · cited 1×
“Others have linked various life-history or functional characteristics to disturbance response, including life forms (Raunkiaer 1934); competitor, stress-tolerator, or ruderal strategies (Grime 1977); assembly or response rules (Keddy 1992); vital attributes (Noble and Slatyer 1980; Rowe 1983); functional types (review…”
BackgroundTHE MAINTENANCE OF SPECIES‐RICHNESS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REGENERATION NICHE
GRUBB, P. J. (1977) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1977.tb01347.x · Cited by 4,402
The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics.
Proctor, J., Pickett, S. T. A., & White, P. S. (1986) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2403105 · Cited by 3,949
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2141 · Cited by 2,347
The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography
Raunkiær, C. C. (1934) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,313
Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology
Keddy, P. A. (1992) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3235676 · Cited by 2,193
The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-02952-3 · Cited by 2,121
Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics: An Introduction
WHITE, P. S., & PICKETT, S. T. A. (1985) · The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-554520-4.50006-x · Cited by 1,031
Noble, I. R., & Slatyer, R. O. (1980) · Succession · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9200-9_2 · Cited by 959
Cited by
Understory Vegetation Dynamics of North American Boreal Forests
Hart, S. A., & Chen, H. Y. H. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680600819286 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, M. R.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1273-1283
- ISSN
- 0008-4026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032941248
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/b04-091
- The paper
- Roberts, M. R. (2004). Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests. Canadian Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.