The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cell and tissue cultures of Catharanthus roseus: A literature survey: II. Updating from 1988 to 1993
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Production of plant secondary metabolites: a historical perspective
Bourgaud, F., Gravot, A., Milesi, S., & Gontier, E. (2001) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-9452(01)00490-3 · Cited by 1,251
Biotechnology for the production of plant secondary metabolites
Verpoorte, R., Contin, A., & Memelink, J. (2002) · Phytochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1023/a:1015871916833 · Cited by 606
Self-citation(2007) · Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review · Cited by 522
Chandran, H., Meena, M., Barupal, T., & Sharma, K. (2020) · Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00450 · Cited by 462
Production of Secondary Metabolites Using Plant Cell Cultures
Smetanska, I. (2008) · Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/10_2008_103 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Moreno, P. R. H., van der Heijden, R., & Verpoorte, R.
- Venue
- Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 0167-6857 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5044
- OpenAlex
- W2317906320
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell and tissue cultures of Catharanthus roseus: A literature survey: II. Updating from 1988 to 1993. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00037677
- The paper
- Moreno, P. R. H., van der Heijden, R., & Verpoorte, R. (1995). Cell and tissue cultures of Catharanthus roseus: A literature survey: II. Updating from 1988 to 1993. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00037677
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
