Idioms of distress: Kinship and sickness among the people of the Kingdom of Tonga
Abstract
"Idioms of distress" refers to the popular expression of emotional tension that arises in the relationship between 'sickness' and 'kinship'. By reference to case studies and discussions among the Polynesian people of Tonga, the author shows where such tension arises and how it influences the sickness process. Sickness is necessarily a collective phenomenon which can best be understood not simply as a clinical event, but as an experience that is part of the experience of 'family'. Various ways of expressing distress as a reflexive encounter between personal and cultural meaning systems are reviewed, as are several new concepts such as "doing sickness as kinship", and "turning" in the process of decision making in the kinship management of sickness. The explanatory models of sickness in Tonga are shown to encompass culturally sanctioned expressions of distress as part of of the adaptive coping mechanisms in that society. Distress frequently emerges in somatic form, as a number of studies have shown. However, the author emphasizes the "kinship meaning of sickness", "kinship management and sickness therapy", "the adaptive process of idiomatic expressions of distress", which are expanded here and offered as potential avenues for elaboration in other cultural milieu. Two aspects of the notion "idioms of distress" are noted, and the phenomenon is understood as a process which acts as a "prime mover" in social change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Early anthropological research typically generalised healers' explanations to give a seeming representative picture of Tongan medicine.
“Such a model was implicitly supported by early anthropological research that typically generalised healer's explanations to give a seeming representative picture of Tongan medicine (see Cowling 1990;Parsons 1984Parsons , 1985)).”
From ‘Traditional’ Healers, Speaking and Motivation in Vava'u, Tonga: Explaining Syncretism and Addressing Health Policy (2010) · cites this paper as Parsons 1984
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gibson, K., Haslam, N., & Kaplan, I. (2019) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1363461519847057 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Poltorak, M. (2010) · Oceania · doi:10.1002/j.1834-4461.2010.tb00069.x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Parsons, C. D. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Waikato (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Parsons, Claire D. F.
- Venue
- Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry
- Published
- 1984-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-93
- ISSN
- 0165-005X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-076X
- OpenAlex
- W1997532432
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Culture Medicine and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- idioms of distress, kinship, illness, Polynesians, family, coping strategies, illness management, social change
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Cultural Characteristics, Ethnicity, Family, Humans, Medicine, Traditional, Mental Healing, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Social Environment, Social Support, Somatoform Disorders, Stress, Psychological, Tonga
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review