Cited by 242Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Twenty years of research on advance organizers: Assimilation theory is still the best predictor of results

Mayer, Richard E.·1979·Instructional Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00117008

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayer, R. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Mayer, Richard E.
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
1979-04
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
133-167
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W2071018562
Cited by
242
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
advance organizers, assimilation theory, prior knowledge, text structure, transfer of learning, retention, prerequisite knowledge, instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review