Cited by 116Soil erosion and sediment transportAgroforestry and silvopastoral systemsAfrican Botany and Ecology Studies

Agroforestry systems and soil surface management of a tropical alfisol: II: Water runoff, soil erosion, and nutrient loss

Lal, R.·1989·Agroforestry Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00123115

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lal, R.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lal, R.
ORCID
Lal, R.
Venue
Agroforestry Systems
Published
1989-04
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
97-111
ISSN
  • 0167-4366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9680
OpenAlex
W2329320370
Cited by
116
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agroforestry Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › African Botany and Ecology Studies
Keywords
agroforestry, soil erosion, runoff, nutrient loss, Leucaena leucocephala, Gliricidia sepium, contour hedgerows, no-tillage, plow tillage, nutrient cycling, tropical soils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review