Cited by 19Astro and Planetary ScienceAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesPlanetary Science and Exploration

Organic matter in meteorites and comets: Possible origins

Anders, Edward·1991·Space Science Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00178405

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anders, E.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Anders, Edward
Venue
Space Science Reviews
Published
1991-04
Volume
56
Issue
1-2
ISSN
  • 0038-6308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9672
OpenAlex
W2036967863
Cited by
19
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Space Science Reviews (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
extraterrestrial organic matter, meteorites, comets, solar nebula, asteroid interior structure, interstellar clouds, kerogen, formaldehyde, hydrogen cyanide, unsaturated hydrocarbons, interstellar medium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review