Cited by 59Demographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socioeconomic determinants of fertility in China: A microeconometric analysis

Zhang, Junsen·1990·Journal of Population Economics

Abstract

"This paper reports the first set of estimates of the socioeconomic determinants of fertility in China using micro-data available from China's 1985 In-Depth Fertility Survey. Based on existing microeconomic theories of fertility, an econometric model was specified and estimated. The results indicate that even after age, marriage duration and child mortality are taken into account, education level of the woman, occupational status of the husband, the place of former and current residence, sex preference for boys, durable goods ownership, and family structure affect fertility."

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00187287

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The higher fertility of women in extended families in Japan and China was attributed to the reduced opportunity costs of childrearing for women.

    “and these findings were attributed to the reduced opportunity costs of childrearing for women.”

    From Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea (2017) · cites this paper as Zhang 1990

  • Women in extended families in Japan and China had more children than their counterparts in nuclear families.

    “Morgan and Hirosima (1983) in Japan and Zhang (1990) in China found that women in extended families had more children than their counterparts in nuclear families”

    From Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea (2017) · cites this paper as Zhang 1990

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, J.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Junsen
Venue
Journal of Population Economics
Published
1990-08
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
105-23
ISSN
  • 0933-1433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1475
OpenAlex
W1597094388
Cited by
59
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Population Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
fertility determinants, socioeconomic determinants of fertility, China, women's education, family structure, marriage duration, child mortality
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Asia, Behavior, China, Demography, Developing Countries, Economics, Educational Status, Employment, Family Characteristics, Asia, Eastern, Fertility, Geography, Infant Mortality, Marriage, Models, Theoretical, Mortality, Population, Population Characteristics, Population Dynamics, Psychology, Research, Residence Characteristics, Sex, Social Class, Social Values, Socioeconomic Factors, Statistics as Topic, Models, Economic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review