Determination of Young's modulus for spruce, fir and isotropic materials by the resonance flexure method with comparisons to static flexure and other dynamic methods
Abstract
Dynamic methods provide rapid and accurate means to determine Young's modulus, i.e. the modulus of elasticity, of wood. For dry, clear specimens of epicea common (Norway spruce, picea excelsa) and sapin pictine (silver fir, abies amabilis) we present a comparison of results from tests by a resonance flexure method with results obtained from four-point static flexure tests. For a wide range of specimen size the resonance flexure method provides a simpler, more rapidly performed alternative to the classical static flexure method, giving Young's modulus values which are for the spruce and fir specimens of this study, nearly identical to those caalculated from the static flexure tests. Results are also presented which show that a resonance longitudinal method yields higher values of Young's modulus and an ultrasonic method yields still higher values. We provide also a comparison of the four test methods applied to isotropic materials.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In new Norway spruce timber, Edyn from ultrasound is higher than Edyn from longitudinal vibration, and Edyn from longitudinal vibration is higher than MOE.
“As reported by other authors in new Norway spruce timber [65] Edyn from ultrasounds is higher than Edyn from longitudinal vibration and this is higher that MOE.”
From Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes (2023) · cites this paper as [65]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes
Llana, D. F., Íñiguez-González, G., Plos, M., & Turk, G. (2023) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132440 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Utami, S. S., Mappuji, A., Achmad, B., Awaluddin, A., Ayutyastuti, A., Luckyarno, Y. F., & Yanti, R. J. (2020) · Engineering Journal · doi:10.4186/ej.2020.24.6.109 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haines, D., Leban, J.-M., & Herb�, C.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- ORCID
- Leban, Jean-Michel
- Venue
- Wood Science and Technology
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 253-263
- ISSN
- 0043-7719 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-5225
- OpenAlex
- W2167741093
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Wood Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
- Keywords
- Young's modulus, elastic modulus, wood, ultrasonic method, Norway spruce, silver fir, isotropic materials, dynamic mechanical testing, specimen size effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review