The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flight control in Drosophila by visual perception of motion
Open accessAbstract
SummaryApparent motion was simulated in the visual system of the tethered fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster by projecting moving stripe patterns onto stationary screens positioned in front of the lateral eye regions. The reactions of the animal were recorded under conditions of stationary flight in still air. It was found that visual stimulation modifies, independently, torque and thrust of the flight system. The responses appear suitable to counteract involuntary changes of direction and altitude in free flight.Concerning the sensory system for visual flight control, the following was established:1.Both eyes are functionally equal, and sensitive to pattern motion in any direction.2.The motion detecting subunits possess a certain orientation on the eye surface, and discriminate between pattern motions that are progressive or regressive relative to this orientation.3.Progressive and regressive stimuli elicit opposite responses in the flight system.4.The subunit orientations are expected to group in at least two different directions that share a common line of symmetry with the internal eye structure.5.A minimum of two contralateral and two ipsilateral nerve connections between the visual system and the motor system is required for the various torque and thrust responses. Concerning the effect of pattern motion on the flight system, the following was found:1.The motion detectors control only the magnitude of the force of flight. With the tethered animal in still air, the inclination of the force vector remains constant.2.Consequently, the stroke plane and the wing pitch should be invariant to visual stimulation.3.Possible influences of pattern motion on the wing-beat frequency were ruled out by frequency measurements.4.The only major variables in wing articulation that respond to pattern motion are the wing-beat amplitudes on either side of the insect. In-flight photographs show that the difference and the sum of these amplitudes are, in fact, representative for the torque and the thrust of the flight system. The responses of the body posture may become important to flight performance at increased airspeed. Comparative experiments with the housefly Musca domestica indicate that the principle of independent torque and thrust control by vision is adopted in at least two different species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hausen, K. (1982) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00335241 · Cited by 363
Tammero, L. F., & Dickinson, M. H. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.3.327 · Cited by 316
Dragonfly Flight : II. Velocities, Accelerations and Kinematics of Flapping Flight
Wakeling, J. M., & Ellington, C. P. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.200.3.557 · Cited by 308
Muscle Efficiency and Elastic Storage in the Flight Motor of Drosophila
Dickinson, M. H., & Lighton, J. R. B. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7701346 · Cited by 254
Mechanics of the thorax in flies
Deora, T., Gundiah, N., & Sane, S. P. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.128363 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Götz, K. G.
- Venue
- Kybernetik
- Published
- 1968-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 199-208
- ISSN
- 0023-5946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067053611
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flight control in Drosophila by visual perception of motion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00272517
- The paper
- Götz, K. G. (1968). Flight control in Drosophila by visual perception of motion. Kybernetik. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00272517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.