The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dragonfly Flight : II. Velocities, Accelerations and Kinematics of Flapping Flight
Abstract
The free flapping flight of the dragonfly Sympetrum sanguineum and the damselfly Calopteryx splendens was filmed in a large flight enclosure at 3000 frames s−1. The wingtip kinematics are described for these flights. Despite the two species being similar in size, the damselfly flew with wingbeat frequencies half those of the dragonfly. The damselfly could perform a clap and fling, and the proximity to which the wings approached each other during this manoeuvre correlated with the total force produced during the wingstroke. The dragonfly beat its wings with a set inclination of the stroke planes with respect to the londitudinal body axis; the damselfly, in contrast, showed a greater variation in this angle. Both species aligned their stroke planes to be nearly normal to the direction of the resultant force, the thrust. In order to achieve this, the dragonfly body alignment correlated with the direction of thrust. However, the damselfly body alignment was independent of the thrust direction. Velocities and accelerations were greater for the dragonfly than for the damselfly. However, non-dimensional velocities and accelerations normalised by the wingbeat periods were greater for the damselfly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weis-Fogh, T. (1973) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.59.1.169 · Cited by 1,371
The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. III. Kinematics
Ellington, C. P. (1984) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1984.0051 · Cited by 811
Self-citationThe aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. I. The quasi-steady analysis
Ellington, C. P. (1984) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1984.0049 · Cited by 671
Self-citationThe aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. IV. Aerodynamic mechanisms
Ellington, C. P. (1984) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1984.0052 · Cited by 535
Self-citationMaximum lift production during takeoff in flying animals
Marden, J. H. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.130.1.235 · Cited by 441
Maxworthy, T. (1979) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112079001774 · Cited by 396
The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming
Azuma, A. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-68210-3 · Cited by 374
Energetics of Hovering Flight in Hummingbirds and in Drosophila
Weis-Fogh, T. (1972) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.56.1.79 · Cited by 360
On the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation
Lighthill, M. J. (1973) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112073000017 · Cited by 356
Flight control in Drosophila by visual perception of motion
Götz, K. G. (1968) · Kybernetik · doi:10.1007/bf00272517 · Cited by 332
Cited by
Askew, G. N., Marsh, R. L., & Ellington, C. P. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.204.21.3601 · Cited by 123
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wakeling, J. M., & Ellington, C. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1997-02-01
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 557-582
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2401174741
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 17.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dragonfly Flight : II. Velocities, Accelerations and Kinematics of Flapping Flight. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.200.3.557
- The paper
- Wakeling, J. M., & Ellington, C. P. (1997). Dragonfly Flight : II. Velocities, Accelerations and Kinematics of Flapping Flight. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.200.3.557
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.