Cited by 49Pancreatic function and diabetesIon channel regulation and functionMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

The permissive effect of glucose, tolbutamide and high K+ on arginine stimulation of insulin release in isolated mouse islets

Open access
Hermans, M. P., Schmeer, W., Henquin, J. C.·1987·Diabetologia

Abstract

Mouse islets were used to study how glucose modulates arginine stimulation of insulin release. At 3 mmol/l glucose, arginine (20 mmol/l) decreased the resting membrane potential of B cells by about 10 mV, but did not evoke electrical activity. This depolarisation was accompanied by a slight but rapid acceleration of 86Rb+ efflux and 45Ca2+ influx. However, 45Ca2+ efflux and insulin release increased only weakly and belatedly. When the membrane was depolarised by threshold (7 mmol/l) or stimulatory (10-15 mmol/l) concentrations of glucose, arginine rapidly induced or augmented electrical activity, markedly accelerated 86Rb+ efflux, 45Ca2+ influx and efflux, and triggered a strong and fast increase in insulin release. When glucose-induced depolarisation of the B-cell membrane was prevented by diazoxide, arginine lost all effects but those produced at low glucose. However, the delayed increase in release still exhibited some glucose-dependency. In contrast, depolarisation by tolbutamide, at low glucose, largely mimicked the permissive effect of high glucose. Depolarisation by high K+ also amplified arginine stimulation of insulin release, but did not accelerate it as did glucose or tolbutamide. Omission of extracellular Ca2+ abolished the releasing effect of arginine under all conditions. The results thus show that the permissive action of glucose mainly results from its ability to depolarise the B-cell membrane. It enables the small depolarisation by arginine itself to activate Ca channels more rapidly and efficiently. Changes in the metabolic state of B cells may also contribute to this permissive action by increasing the efficacy of the initiating signal triggered by arginine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00277325

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Provided KATP channel activity is low, as with >3 mM glucose, the arginine/lysine current is capable of stimulating β-cell electrical activity.

    “Provided KATP channel activity is low (as is the case in the presence of >3 mM glucose), this current is capable of stimulating β-cell electrical activity (278, 499).”

    From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [278]

    In the Results (page not available), arginine induced β-cell electrical activity at 7 mmol/L glucose; the Discussion says it triggered spikes when the membrane was depolarised by glucose or tolbutamide. The paper does not establish an arginine/lysine current or show that any glucose concentration above 3 mmol/L suffices: it reports 7 mmol/L as the threshold condition tested for this effect. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Matthews EK (1985) Electrophysiology of pancreatic r-cells. In: Poisner AM and Trifaro JM (eds) The electrophysiology of the secretory cell. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp93-112

Cited by

Authors
Hermans, M. P., Schmeer, W., & Henquin, J. C.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Saarland University (DE)
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
1987-08
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
659-665
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W1804212329
Cited by
49
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
insulin secretion, arginine stimulation, glucose, tolbutamide, high potassium, pancreatic beta cells, membrane depolarization, calcium channels, rubidium efflux, calcium influx, diazoxide, extracellular calcium
MeSH terms
Animals, Arginine, Diazoxide, Female, Glucose, Glucose Solution, Hypertonic, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Membrane Potentials, Mice, Inbred Strains, Potassium, Tolbutamide, Culture Techniques, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review